Titlebook: Once Can Be Enough; Decisive Experiments Allan Franklin,Ronald Laymon Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

coerce

書目名稱Once Can Be Enough影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough被引頻次




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough年度引用




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough讀者反饋




書目名稱Once Can Be Enough讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

殘忍

t, and serendipity in science.Argues that replication is not.There has recently been considerable discussion of a “replication crisis” in some areas of science. In this book, the authors argue that replication is not a necessary criterion for the validation of a scientific experiment. Five episodes

猛烈責(zé)罵

The Discovery of the Omega Minus Hyperone experimental discovery to establish the existence of the particle to the degree that further experimental and theoretical development was clearly justified, which ultimately led to the quark model of elementary particles.

說不出

The Meselson-Stahl Experiment: “the Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology”hat experiment was further refined so as to yield a more accurate result. These experiments set the stage for the creation of new competing accounts of DNA replication all of which—given the framework established by the Meselson-Stahl experiments—were eliminated by experimental tests leaving only the Watson-Crick model in play.

AVERT

Once Came Close to Being Enough: Electron Polarization and Parity Nonconservation β decay. The second scattering showed a left-right (90°/270°) asymmetry. At the time, no one, including the experimenters themselves, realized the significance of these results. We will discuss whether these results did, in fact, demonstrate parity nonconservation and why they were overlooked.

危機(jī)

The Search for the Magnetic Monopolegle North or South magnetic poles, something which had never been observed. Dirac’s theory also predicted the strength of such a magnetic pole. In 1982 Blas Cabrera reported an event which fit Dirac’s prediction very well. Yet Cabrera made no discovery claim nor was Dirac’s theory regarded as confirmed. The reasons for this are discussed.

多嘴多舌

中子

散布

Book 2021is not a necessary criterion for the validation of a scientific experiment. Five episodes from physics and genetics are used to substantiate this thesis: the Meselson-Stahl experiment on DNA replication, the discoveries of the positron and the omega minus hyperon,? Mendel’s plant experiments, and th

進(jìn)取心