找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Objects and Identity; An Examination of th Harold W. Noonan Book 1980 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1980 John Locke.Plato.idea.logic

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 22151|回復(fù): 54
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:11:59 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity
副標(biāo)題An Examination of th
編輯Harold W. Noonan
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/701/700230/700230.mp4
叢書(shū)名稱Melbourne International Philosophy Series
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Objects and Identity; An Examination of th Harold W. Noonan Book 1980 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1980 John Locke.Plato.idea.logic
描述Identity has for long been an important concept in philosophy and logic. Plato in his Sophist puts same among those fonns which "run through" all others. The scholastics inherited the idea (and the tenninology), classifying same as one of the "transcendentals", i.e. as running through all the categories. The work of Locke and l.eibniz made the concept a problematic one. But it is rather recently, i.e. since the importance of Frege has been generally recognized, that there has been a keen interest in the notion, fonnulated by him, of a criterion of identity. This, at first sight harmless as well as useful, has proved to be like a charge of dynamite. The seed had indeed been sown long ago, by Euclid. In Book V of his Elements he first gives a useless defmition of a ratio: "A ratio is a sort of relation between two magnitudes in respect of muchness". But then, in definition 5 he answers, not the question "What is a ratio?" but rather ‘‘What is it for magnitudes to be in the same ratio?" and this is the definition that does the work.
出版日期Book 1980
關(guān)鍵詞John Locke; Plato; idea; logic; philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2466-1
isbn_softcover978-90-481-8259-6
isbn_ebook978-94-017-2466-1
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 1980
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Objects and Identity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:44:52 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:24:01 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:10:14 | 只看該作者
" all others. The scholastics inherited the idea (and the tenninology), classifying same as one of the "transcendentals", i.e. as running through all the categories. The work of Locke and l.eibniz made the concept a problematic one. But it is rather recently, i.e. since the importance of Frege has b
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:14:57 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:40:01 | 只看該作者
Diachronic Identity as Relative Identity,ore the notion of a sortal concept for a while. When Wiggins comes to discuss arguments against his view what he discusses are arguments designed to prove that certain . absolute equivalence relations are actually relative, and he tries to show that these are bad arguments.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:11:23 | 只看該作者
Sortal Concepts and Identity,why this principle should not be abandoned this constitutes an objection to these claims and also a justification, if like Wiggins one finds Quine’s four-dimensional ontology unpalatable, for denying that Pis now a man or that Tib is a cat when Tibbles has lost his tail.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:54:10 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:20:06 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:17:17 | 只看該作者
Events, Continuants and Diachronic Identity, we have so far seen reason to favour. When we have isolated this point of disagreement, however, we shall see that our arguments up to now are not sufficient to decide between the opposing positions. Later on I shall state another argument which does so.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 14:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
屏山县| 台东县| 银川市| 从化市| 姚安县| 铁力市| 孟连| 丰镇市| 开远市| 噶尔县| 武清区| 庄河市| 通化县| 伊金霍洛旗| 巴塘县| 准格尔旗| 铜陵市| 福鼎市| 新绛县| 盐池县| 黎川县| 洪洞县| 内丘县| 彭山县| 都昌县| 卢湾区| 普安县| 方山县| 六安市| 吉木乃县| 乐业县| 哈巴河县| 华安县| 遵义县| 定州市| 丰城市| 民权县| 新津县| 吐鲁番市| 宁国市| 吉林省|