找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Objectivity in Science; New Perspectives fro Flavia Padovani,Alan Richardson,Jonathan Y. Tsou Book 2015 Springer International Publishing S

[復制鏈接]
查看: 54427|回復: 48
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:28:59 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Objectivity in Science
副標題New Perspectives fro
編輯Flavia Padovani,Alan Richardson,Jonathan Y. Tsou
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/701/700226/700226.mp4
概述Is the first Science and Technology Studies collection entirely devoted to this topic.Contains original essays on objectivity by Peter Galison, Sandra Harding, Ian Hacking and Alison Wylie.Offers a va
叢書名稱Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
圖書封面Titlebook: Objectivity in Science; New Perspectives fro Flavia Padovani,Alan Richardson,Jonathan Y. Tsou Book 2015 Springer International Publishing S
描述This highly multidisciplinary collection discusses an increasingly important topic among scholars in science and technology studies: objectivity in science. It features eleven essays on scientific objectivity from a variety of perspectives, including philosophy of science, history of science, and feminist philosophy. Topics addressed in the book include the nature and value of scientific objectivity, the history of objectivity, and objectivity in scientific journals and communities. Taken individually, the essays supply new methodological tools for theorizing what is valuable in the pursuit of objective knowledge and for investigating its history. The essays offer many starting points, while suggesting new avenues of research. Taken collectively, the essays exemplify the very virtues of objectivity that they theorize—in reading them together, the reader can sense various anxieties about the dangerously subjective in our age and locate commonalities of concern as well as differences of approach.?As a result, the volume offers an expansive vision of a research community seeking a communal understanding of its own methods and its own epistemic anxieties, struggling to enunciate the ke
出版日期Book 2015
關鍵詞Breast-Cancer Narratives; Community-based Collaborative Research (CBPR); History of the Senses; Ideals
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14349-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-38293-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-14349-1Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942
issn_series 0068-0346
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Objectivity in Science影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Objectivity in Science影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Objectivity in Science網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Objectivity in Science網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Objectivity in Science被引頻次




書目名稱Objectivity in Science被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Objectivity in Science年度引用




書目名稱Objectivity in Science年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Objectivity in Science讀者反饋




書目名稱Objectivity in Science讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:49:06 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:10:46 | 只看該作者
Objectivity for Sciences from Belowity and predictive powers. After all, corporate, imperial, or military interests and motives don’t make weapons less reliable at killing; nor do environmental or health concerns in themselves damage the reliability of research they motivate. Only in some cases, but not all, do social values and inte
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:00:07 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:58:28 | 只看該作者
The Ethos of Critique in German Idealismaims. They contend that the modern notion of objectivity was defined, in part, as a reaction against the subjectivity of idealism. This paper examines the ethos of critique in idealism, and how it produced more nuanced views of the interrelationships of subjectivity and objectivity than nineteenth-c
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:43:55 | 只看該作者
The Physiology of the Sense Organs and Early Neo-Kantian Conceptions of Objectivity: Helmholtz, Langedge in the 1850–1870s. In the first half of the nineteenth century, Müller amassed a body of experimental evidence to support his doctrine, according to which the character of our sensations is determined by the structures of our own sensory nerves, and not by the external objects that cause the se
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:44:16 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:33:45 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:18:00 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:51:03 | 只看該作者
A Plurality of Pluralisms: Collaborative Practice in Archaeologyming conventional research practice. While critics object that these partnerships cannot but compromise the objectivity of archaeological science, many of the archaeologists involved argue that their research is substantially enriched by them. I counter objections raised by internal critics and crys
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 21:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
通渭县| 岳西县| 农安县| 张北县| 中卫市| 普安县| 乐业县| 清水河县| 县级市| 桐庐县| 湟中县| 潢川县| 西乡县| 湖北省| 汕头市| 治县。| 丹寨县| 南木林县| 寻乌县| 原平市| 黄梅县| 东平县| 溆浦县| 潢川县| 松江区| 垣曲县| 渭南市| 盈江县| 石门县| 隆安县| 岳西县| 平罗县| 屏边| 锦州市| 雷波县| 岑巩县| 民乐县| 神池县| 金坛市| 扶余县| 衢州市|