找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Norman Geras’s Political Thought from Marxism to Human Rights; Controversy and Anal Mark Cowling Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: onychomycosis
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:57:58 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 09:21:15 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 14:27:36 | 只看該作者
Mark Cowlingy, he was supremely conscious of not merely reflecting but, indeed, advancing the revolution in thought which, becoming critically self-aware of its liberating power, would radically challenge established ideas and institutions and determine the structure of values which continue to shape our lives
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:18:37 | 只看該作者
Mark Cowlingms, promoting dialectic from relative obscurity to a more appropriate position at the forefront of Islamic legal studies. The author introduces and develops a dialectics-based analytical method for the study of pre-modern Islamic legal argumentation, examines parallels and divergences between Aristo
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:45:44 | 只看該作者
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:35:57 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:28:49 | 只看該作者
Mark Cowlingnd consuming use values through reference to the theoretical contributions of semiotics, but without denying the primacy of nature and the primacy of the material as the inalienable foundation of human communication. Here, we find an essential difference vis-à-vis a series of contemporary approaches
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:28:32 | 只看該作者
f Human Rights, and Hannah Arendt’s complaint that the idea human rights has made so little progress because its champions failed to get beyond the status of a society for the protection of animals, seems long dated. Hardly anyone today would say they are not concerned with the protection of Human R
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 15:01:48 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:24:22 | 只看該作者
The Legacy of Rosa Luxemburg,ocialism or barbarism?’, but Cowling argues that Geras should have said more about Luxemburg’s economic theory, which underpins this slogan. Geras discusses Luxemburg’s view of the period between the Russian Revolution of 1905 and that of 1917. He claims, which Cowling disputes, that Luxemburg came
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-9 23:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
文水县| 丰原市| 鱼台县| 绥阳县| 称多县| 洞口县| 闻喜县| 龙游县| 明星| 五大连池市| 元阳县| 房山区| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 西吉县| 沙河市| 襄汾县| 利辛县| 宝清县| 克拉玛依市| 池州市| 长白| 浦北县| 松潘县| 南召县| 含山县| 漳州市| 大新县| 突泉县| 永寿县| 建湖县| 贞丰县| 林西县| 五原县| 青阳县| 上蔡县| 永泰县| 福安市| 贵溪市| 九台市| 浠水县| 泰顺县|