Titlebook: Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization; Kaisa Miettinen Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998 linear optimization.multi-o

截?cái)?/a>

Graphical Illustration the decision maker in specifying values for problem parameters or to illustrate the contents and the meaning of questions posed by the algorithms. In such realizations, the upper limit lies in one’s imagination.

吃掉

WAX

No-Preference Methods using some relatively simple method and the solution obtained is presented to the decision maker. The decision maker may either accept or reject the solution. It seems quite unlikely that the solution best satisfying the decision maker could be found with these methods. That is why no-preference me

在前面

薄荷醇

A Priori Methodsy is that the decision maker does not necessarily know beforehand what it is possible to attain in the problem and how realistic her or his expectations are. The working order in these methods is: 1) decision maker, 2) analyst.

restrain

Obverse

Comparing Methodso be superior to the others in every aspect. Selecting a multiobjective optimization method is a problem with multiple objectives itself. Thus some matters of comparison and selection between the methods are worth considering.

陳舊

Density

Graphical Illustration the decision maker in specifying values for problem parameters or to illustrate the contents and the meaning of questions posed by the algorithms. In such realizations, the upper limit lies in one’s imagination.

quiet-sleep

Future Directionsw. In addition, we give examples of promising ideas for research where the first steps have been taken but further work is needed. All the issues mentioned and many others merit further research and examination.