Titlebook: Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management; A Special Issue of t Christian Gollier,Mark Machina Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New

根深蒂固

書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management被引頻次




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management年度引用




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management讀者反饋




書目名稱Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

小淡水魚

Metamorphosis

Non-Expected Utility and the Robustness of the Classical Insurance Paradigm,oinsurance and deductible insurance, the structure of Pareto-efficient bilateral insurance contracts, the structure of Pareto-efficient multilateral risk-sharing agreements, and self-insurance and self-protection. Most, though not all, of the basic results in this area are found to be quite robust to dropping the expected utility hypothesis.

輕推

A Comparison of the Estimates of Expected Utility and Non-Expected-Utility Preference Functionals,complete ranking) of experimentally obtaining data on such preferences. What is revealed is that the magnitude of the subject error is clearly conditional on the elicitation method used and, rather alarmingly, that the preference functional apparently employed by the subject may also be conditional on the elicitation method.

dragon

Book 1995behavior. A more realisticmodel is needed. This is particularly true when treating attitudestoward small probability events: the standard situation for insurablerisks. ..Non-Expected Utility and Risk Management. examines whether theexisting results in insurance economics are robust to more generalmodels of behavior under risk.

貪婪地吃

The Comparative Statics of Deductible Insurance in Expected- and Non-Expected-Utility Theories,mal deductible increases for utility representations in a particular class but decreases for some representations outside that class. We give results both for the demand for insurance, as well as for the equilibrium contract.

Chagrin

NOTCH

Rinne-Test

Risk-Aversion Concepts in Expected- and Non-Expected-Utility Models, different. Moreover, we show that, even in the expected utility framework, the new notion of monotone increasing risk can give better answers to some problems of comparative statics such as in portfolio choice or in partial insurance. This new notion also can suggest more intuitive approaches to inequalities measurement.

synovitis