找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: No Longer the Same; Religious Others and David R. Brockman Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2011 argue.Chris

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 我在爭斗志
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:14:41 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:41:14 | 只看該作者
Outsiders and Insiders,out what non-Christians think? What’s wrong with a sharp separation between the Christian “inside” and the non-Christian “outside”? Isn’t Christian theology an inherently intra-Christian conversation, a discourse carried on . Christians . Christian belief . Christian purposes? If so, why should it i
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:59:10 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:55:00 | 只看該作者
Schleiermacher,Barth, though vigorously opposed to key aspects of Schleiermacher’s theology, admitted, “The first place in a history of the theology of the most recent times belongs and will always belong to Schleiermacher, and he has no rival.”. Keith Clements notes that “Schleiermacher’s ascription of religion t
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:26:25 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:12:08 | 只看該作者
,Gutiérrez,lity of transformative encounter with religious others and thus, potentially, with the divine Other. In this chapter we examine how a fourth theologian fares: Gustavo Gutiérrez. Gutiérrez is the only one of our four theologians to make an explicit turn to the marginalized and to focus on their strug
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:05:23 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,t least the only game that mattered. In this respect, the four theologians we have examined end up offering more of the same. Despite dramatic differences in method, in their construal of “the Christian,” and in the authority structures upon which they ground their theological formulations, they con
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:33:52 | 只看該作者
n de l’amylo?de dans le système nerveux il y a quelques lacunes à remplir. Nous ne savons ainsi par exemple pas, en ce qui conserne les racines rachidiennes, à quelle distance de la mo?lle épinière les dép?ts commencent à appara?tre. De même nous ne savons pas à quelle distance de leur origine les d
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:15:54 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:33:06 | 只看該作者
Introduction,eve and what those beliefs mean for their own lives—tended to be a conversation in which Christians talked among themselves, as if the wider religious world did not exist, did not matter, or was simply a realm of the idolatrous and the damned.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 09:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
贡嘎县| 崇信县| 浦城县| 九江市| 靖安县| 南宫市| 上栗县| 阆中市| 枣庄市| 新河县| 黄平县| 许昌市| 莱阳市| 卢龙县| 独山县| 南丰县| 桃园县| 察雅县| 奇台县| 青浦区| 朝阳县| 汾阳市| 鄄城县| 贵阳市| 项城市| 平山县| 马山县| 中阳县| 根河市| 宁阳县| 石河子市| 西林县| 准格尔旗| 高青县| 南漳县| 区。| 延川县| 土默特左旗| 黔西县| 曲周县| 彰化市|