找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: No Longer the Same; Religious Others and David R. Brockman Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2011 argue.Chris

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 我在爭斗志
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:14:41 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:41:14 | 只看該作者
Outsiders and Insiders,out what non-Christians think? What’s wrong with a sharp separation between the Christian “inside” and the non-Christian “outside”? Isn’t Christian theology an inherently intra-Christian conversation, a discourse carried on . Christians . Christian belief . Christian purposes? If so, why should it i
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:59:10 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:55:00 | 只看該作者
Schleiermacher,Barth, though vigorously opposed to key aspects of Schleiermacher’s theology, admitted, “The first place in a history of the theology of the most recent times belongs and will always belong to Schleiermacher, and he has no rival.”. Keith Clements notes that “Schleiermacher’s ascription of religion t
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:26:25 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:12:08 | 只看該作者
,Gutiérrez,lity of transformative encounter with religious others and thus, potentially, with the divine Other. In this chapter we examine how a fourth theologian fares: Gustavo Gutiérrez. Gutiérrez is the only one of our four theologians to make an explicit turn to the marginalized and to focus on their strug
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:05:23 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,t least the only game that mattered. In this respect, the four theologians we have examined end up offering more of the same. Despite dramatic differences in method, in their construal of “the Christian,” and in the authority structures upon which they ground their theological formulations, they con
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:33:52 | 只看該作者
n de l’amylo?de dans le système nerveux il y a quelques lacunes à remplir. Nous ne savons ainsi par exemple pas, en ce qui conserne les racines rachidiennes, à quelle distance de la mo?lle épinière les dép?ts commencent à appara?tre. De même nous ne savons pas à quelle distance de leur origine les d
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:15:54 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:33:06 | 只看該作者
Introduction,eve and what those beliefs mean for their own lives—tended to be a conversation in which Christians talked among themselves, as if the wider religious world did not exist, did not matter, or was simply a realm of the idolatrous and the damned.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 21:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
禄丰县| 宣威市| 紫阳县| 龙里县| 密云县| 台江县| 梁河县| 永昌县| 德州市| 山西省| 长寿区| 突泉县| 镇沅| 安仁县| 武邑县| 诏安县| 炉霍县| 凯里市| 开江县| 鹤山市| 香格里拉县| 达尔| 西乡县| 繁昌县| 依兰县| 石狮市| 南乐县| 沈阳市| 青神县| 丰台区| 昌乐县| 增城市| 三原县| 辽中县| 宜黄县| 绥芬河市| 德钦县| 清水河县| 文安县| 巩义市| 黄大仙区|