Titlebook: New World Order and Small Regions; The Case of South Ca Emil Avdaliani Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc

AMASS

書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions網絡公開度




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions被引頻次




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions年度引用




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions年度引用學科排名




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions讀者反饋




書目名稱New World Order and Small Regions讀者反饋學科排名

Bother

,Turkey’s Evolving Approach to the Black Sea and the South Caucasus Region,eepening geopolitical engagement through the prism of a realist Eurasianism. Unlike the classical Russian Eurasianism and its later variations, Turkey’s approach is highly pragmatic that seeks the spaces and conflicts it can tap into to increase its regional outreach.

怪物

Introduction,he highly fluid present world order. As the world, despite the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and numerous other crises, has nevertheless maintained an unprecedented level of economic and political interconnectedness, no story of the South Caucasus could be related without contextualizing larger developments taking place in the world.

Afflict

inhibit

al discourses of regional powers – Russia, Turkey and Iran.AThe book provides a comprehensive understanding of the unfolding geopolitical changes in the South Caucasus in the age of increased great power competition across Eurasia. Recent research on the geopolitics of the South Caucasus focuses eit

unstable-angina

IST

谷類

From Central Asia to the Black Sea: China and the South Caucasus,its role economically and politically, but it has not yet reached the desired level. This “Cauc-Asian” perspective explains the Chinese reticence in the South Caucasus. Engagement with the latter is likely to move beyond patchy investments and reach a new level once infrastructure in Central Asia and trans-Caspian connectivity improves.

Dysarthria

,Russia’s “Return” to the South Caucasus,argued that Moscow’s heavy reliance on the military component in formulating its foreign policy toward the South Caucasus cuts at Russia’s prestige, without which it will be difficult to maintain a long-term hegemony based on consent and willingness from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia.

POLYP