找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences; Some Moral Implicati William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph Book 19821st edition D. R

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 34170|回復(fù): 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:09:06 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences
副標(biāo)題Some Moral Implicati
編輯William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/666/665413/665413.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences; Some Moral Implicati William B. Bondeson,H. Tristram Engelhardt,Joseph  Book 19821st edition D. R
描述The spectacular development of medical knowledge over the last two centuries has brought intrusive advances in the capabilities of medical technology. These advances have been remarkable over the last century, but especially over the last few decades, culminating in such high technology interventions as heart transplants and renal dialysis. These increases in medical powers have attracted societal interest in acquiring more such knowledge. They have also spawned concerns regarding the use of human subjects in research and regarding the byproducts of basic research as in the recent recombinant DNA debate. As a consequence of the development of new biomedical knowledge, physicians and biomedical scientists have been placed in positions of new power and responsibility. The emergence of this group of powerful and knowledgeable experts has occasioned debates regarding the accountability of physicians and biomedical scientists. But beyond that, the very investment of resources in the acquisition of new knowledge has been questioned. Societies must decide whether finite resources would not be better invested at this juncture, or in general, in the alleviation of the problems of hunger or
出版日期Book 19821st edition
關(guān)鍵詞Biomedical ethics; Medical Ethics; ethical theory; ethics; health; morality
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5
isbn_softcover978-94-009-7725-9
isbn_ebook978-94-009-7723-5
copyrightD. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1982
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences被引頻次




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences年度引用




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences讀者反饋




書目名稱New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:56:59 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:31:50 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:37:29 | 只看該作者
The Physician as Moral ArbiterWhen asked to comment about the physician as moral arbiter, I thought it useful to begin by considering just what a moral arbiter would be. To speak of someone as a moral arbiter, or to speak of some group as functioning in that role, is to say that there is arbitration and that it concerns moral matters.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:15:30 | 只看該作者
Only the Best is Good Enough?Nicholas Reseller’s argument is wonderfully direct and important. Moreover, he raises exceedingly grave moral questions, questions which are simply “ungetaroundable”, to use C. I. Lewis’s plain term for what is insistently present.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:02:49 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:13:57 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:42:07 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:38:28 | 只看該作者
Rights and Responsibilities in Medical Sciencepolicy would do well to start in the midst of policy problems” ([1], p. 60). I will paraphrase that, and say, “philosophers, lawyers and legislators interested in medical problems and the application of medical research, would do well to start in the midst of clinical problems by participating in th
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:12:09 | 只看該作者
Book 19821st editionysicians and biomedical scientists. But beyond that, the very investment of resources in the acquisition of new knowledge has been questioned. Societies must decide whether finite resources would not be better invested at this juncture, or in general, in the alleviation of the problems of hunger or
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 07:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
大姚县| 定西市| 达尔| 大厂| 花垣县| 瑞安市| 丹东市| 榆林市| 光泽县| 象山县| 恩施市| 南平市| 佳木斯市| 茌平县| 睢宁县| 通许县| 大洼县| 肃宁县| 渝中区| 五指山市| 商南县| 新民市| 志丹县| 获嘉县| 绍兴市| 林口县| 梁山县| 徐闻县| 化州市| 丽江市| 横峰县| 敦煌市| 于都县| 绍兴市| 三门县| 上饶市| 韩城市| 九龙城区| 哈尔滨市| 临沭县| 固始县|