Titlebook: New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys; Proceedings of the 1 Brian J. McLean,Daniel A. Golombek,Harry E. Payne Conference proceedin

去是公開

書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys被引頻次




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys年度引用




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys讀者反饋




書目名稱New Horizons from Multi-Wavelength Sky Surveys讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

頭盔

FAR

Prospects for Future Astrometric Missionsfor a mission within the next five years would be through a collaborative effort for a small, fast, cheap spacecraft which could be a precursor for future, larger, more accurate missions, which are under study.

negligence

箴言

Incompetent

別炫耀

Denis: a Deep Near Infrared Southern Sky Surveyyear mainly dedicated to technical tests and pilot surveys of selected regions of high astronomical interest. In September 1996, approximately 3000 square degrees of the sky have been covered, and the survey should be completed in 1999.

Debate

The Miyun 232 MHz General Catalogueatalogue, using a matching radius of 100 arcseconds. The remaining MGC objects were then matched with the B2/B3 (408 MHz), 4C (178 MHz), Texas (365 MHz, 1400 MHz) and 87GB (4.85 GHz) catalogues. 6850 MGC sources were found to lack any radio counterpart in these reference catalogues. It means 19.9% of sources listed in the MGC are probably new.

Endearing

GIDDY

The Prospects of Large Surveys in Astronomyf the extent to which these two approaches—emphasis on instrumental capabilities, as contrasted to emphasis on sky coverage—also contribute to an increase in astrophysical understanding. Here, the distinction needs to be made between discovering a new phenomenon and understanding its underlying processes.