Titlebook: New Directions in Soviet Literature; Sheelagh Duffin Graham (Senior Lecturer in Russian Book 1992 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmil

多話(huà)

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)New Directions in Soviet Literature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

calamity

Village Prose: Chauvinism, Nationalism or Nostalgia?, My chapter will attempt to untangle this complex situation first by defining this literary movement, and then by distinguishing the legacy of canonical village prose from the activities of people who at one time wrote this type of literature, and from literary critics and ideologues who have adapte

freight

Arrhythmia

竊喜

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22331-2Analyse; drama; fiction

concentrate

Hectic

Book 19921990. The ten articles range from the experimental prose and drama of the 1920s to studies of work by younger writers of the 1980s. The articles include analyses of works by individual writers and examinations of general phenomena, for example, village prose or the way Stalin is presented in literature of the glasnost era.

subordinate

滑動(dòng)

,Brodsky’s Poetic Self-portrait,ersona, fictional ego, narrative mask or general lyrical subject.. For many researchers the extent of their affinity with the author remains a matter for speculation for, to date, we have found no reliable criteria for establishing the similarities and dissimilarities between the writing ‘I’ and ‘I’ in writing..

Muscularis

A Matter of (Dis)course: Metafiction in the Works of Daniil Kharms,rous in its rejection of literary convention. One of their central claims was that literature in Russia should reflect the significant changes brought about by the October Revolution, principally by reflecting the aesthetic tastes of the growing proletariat. As the group put it in their ‘manifesto’: