找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion; The Rationality of R Hans van Eyghen,Rik Peels,Gijsbert van den Brink Book 2018 Spri

[復制鏈接]
查看: 24040|回復: 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:31:45 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion
副標題The Rationality of R
編輯Hans van Eyghen,Rik Peels,Gijsbert van den Brink
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/666/665049/665049.mp4
概述Presents new insights on the (alleged) implications of new scientific theories on the rationality of religious belief.Connects perspectives from epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of r
叢書名稱New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion
圖書封面Titlebook: New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion; The Rationality of R Hans van Eyghen,Rik Peels,Gijsbert van den Brink Book 2018 Spri
描述.It is widely thought that the cognitive science of religion (CSR) may have a bearing on the epistemic status of religious beliefs and on other topics in philosophy of religion. Epistemologists have used theories from CSR to argue both for and against the rationality of religious beliefs, or they have claimed that CSR is neutral?.vis-à-vis.?the epistemic status of religious belief. However, since CSR is a rapidly evolving discipline, a great deal of earlier research on the topic has become dated. Furthermore, most of the debate on the epistemic consequences of CSR has not taken into account insights from the philosophy of science, such as explanatory pluralism and explanatory levels. This volume overcomes these deficiencies.?..This volume brings together new philosophical reflection on CSR. It?examines the influence of CSR theories on the epistemic status of religious beliefs; it discusses its impact on philosophy of religion; and it offers new insights for CSR. The book addresses the question of whether or not the plurality of theories in CSR makes epistemic conclusions about religious belief unwarranted. It also explores the impact of CSR on other topics in philosophy of religion
出版日期Book 2018
關鍵詞Cognitive Science of Religion; Science and Religion; Religious Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Exp
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90239-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-07970-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-90239-5Series ISSN 2367-3494 Series E-ISSN 2367-3508
issn_series 2367-3494
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion網絡公開度




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion被引頻次




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion年度引用




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion年度引用學科排名




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion讀者反饋




書目名稱New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:44:21 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:31:23 | 只看該作者
New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religionhttp://image.papertrans.cn/n/image/665049.jpg
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:23:38 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90239-5Cognitive Science of Religion; Science and Religion; Religious Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Exp
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:39:07 | 只看該作者
Hans van Eyghen,Rik Peels,Gijsbert van den BrinkPresents new insights on the (alleged) implications of new scientific theories on the rationality of religious belief.Connects perspectives from epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of r
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:17:41 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:27:41 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:41:44 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:03:04 | 只看該作者
Konrad Szocikur hypothesis is fourfold: first, signaling Brazil’s intentions to the world meant slowly changing the substance of bilateral relations, from big political ambitions to immediate trade and investment goals. Second, signaling in the region implied that Brazil progressively abandoned its regional lead
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:45:04 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-14 08:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
封丘县| 咸宁市| 凤庆县| 东阿县| 钟山县| 石阡县| 容城县| 克拉玛依市| 旬邑县| 林周县| 唐河县| 广河县| 武宣县| 新竹县| 新野县| 龙泉市| 茌平县| 富阳市| 玉树县| 大姚县| 若尔盖县| 长泰县| 阿尔山市| 乌恰县| 靖西县| 娄烦县| 海南省| 班玛县| 建德市| 翁源县| 全椒县| 陇南市| 兖州市| 沽源县| 临武县| 五台县| 宝山区| 栾川县| 西宁市| 铜梁县| 三明市|