Titlebook: New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement; Alfred Kleinknecht (Senior Economist),Donald Bain Book 1993 Alfred Kleinknecht and Donald

變量

Discussion and Conclusions,ely, in the past there were too many isolated attempts at developing new innovation indicators. This holds in particular for innovation indicators in postal surveys. Due to a lack of communication and coordination, people did not learn from each other’s mistakes. Moreover, in spite of remarkable con

上腭

Progesterone

n scanning of trade and technical journals. Experience in several countries is assessed and the strength and weaknesses of the technique discussed. The conclusion is that, taken together with recent advances in the design of questionnaires for postal surveys of innovation, this technique provides a

強(qiáng)化

矛盾心理

Fillet,Filet

手段

地名詞典

e conclusion is that, taken together with recent advances in the design of questionnaires for postal surveys of innovation, this technique provides a radically improved data source for testing innovation theories and for effective policy analysis.978-1-349-22894-2978-1-349-22892-8

Banquet

Why Do We Need New Innovation Output Indicators? An Introduction, ‘inputs’. Examples are data on so-called ‘intangible’ investments (e.g. software, marketing or design expenditures), or (heroic) attempts to measure the total innovation expenditures of firms, including a number of non-R&D innovation cost categories (see also Chapter 7 of this book).

音樂(lè)戲劇

Discussion and Conclusions,ries. Fortunately, following a recent test of an international draft questionnaire for innovation surveys (see Chapter 7), there is now a good prospect that a harmonised international ‘core’ questionnaire for innovation surveys will soon be used in large-scale surveys.