Titlebook: New Agendas for Women; Sylvia Walby (Professor of Sociology) Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999

共用

書目名稱New Agendas for Women影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱New Agendas for Women影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Agendas for Women網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱New Agendas for Women網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Agendas for Women被引頻次




書目名稱New Agendas for Women被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Agendas for Women年度引用




書目名稱New Agendas for Women年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Agendas for Women讀者反饋




書目名稱New Agendas for Women讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

MARS

Assignment

A Crisis in Masculinity, or New Agendas for Men?,helmingly so. What is new, however, is that these debates are now more explicit, more gendered, more varied and sometimes more critical. At their base is the assumption that men, like women, are not ‘just naturally like this’ or ‘just bound to be that way’, but rather are the result of historical, political, economic, social and cultural forces.

神圣將軍

Book 1999‘s lives, in particular between those who are qualified and able to engage in employment and those who are not. This wide-ranging book is written by leading academics who have advised key members of the Labour Party.

小淡水魚

刪減

What Welfare Provisions do Women Need to Become Full Citizens?,that have for many years run through feminism — commonly described as difference vs. equality.. They represent a contemporary variant of what Carol Pateman has summed up as Wollstonecraft’s dilemma, after the tensions that ran through Mary Wollstonecraft’s work. On the one hand she writes, women

容易生皺紋

Caring for Children,zens on to the citizens themselves. Citizens in their turn are forced to take on responsibility for constructing their own pathways through the maze of caring, employment and personal responsibilities and the diverse and expanding range of lifestyle choices which are increasingly available.

難理解

Blazon

Jubilation

Violence against Women: a Policy of Neglect or a Neglect of Policy?,ernment Women’s Unit; it remains to be seen whether it will reflect the depth and breadth of the Canadian Panel (1993) report, or echo the courage of perspective which that report and the Australian National Strategy (1992) both display.