找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Neue Entwicklungen in der Dermatologie; Band 4 O. P. Hornstein,M. Hundeiker,J. Sch?nfeld Book 1987Latest edition Springer-Verlag Berlin Hei

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: False-Negative
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:33:59 | 只看該作者
O. Maie,Urs. W. Schnyderty and imagination with the proper use of careful, multidisciplinary epidemiologic approaches. Dr. Guntern has attacked some of the cardinal aspects of the consequences, in terms of health, well.being. and social function, of rapid social change in an originally isolated rural community - a phenomen
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:13:44 | 只看該作者
H. Pfisterty and imagination with the proper use of careful, multidisciplinary epidemiologic approaches. Dr. Guntern has attacked some of the cardinal aspects of the consequences, in terms of health, well.being. and social function, of rapid social change in an originally isolated rural community - a phenomen
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:58:32 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:27:38 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:38:52 | 只看該作者
S. W. Wassilew,Th. Nasemannory of social choice and mechanism design. We examine the premises of this theory, the axiomatic approach, and the mechanism design approach. The main questions are what is collective interest, how is it related to individuals‘ interests, how should one design social interactions, laws, and in- stit
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:16:07 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:17:16 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:29:35 | 只看該作者
M. F?ldi,L. Clodius P.D.,J. R. Casley-Smithis path-breaking contribution, Sen (1970a, 1970b) introduced the first formal formulation of individual rights in social choice theory. Since then, several writers have raised critical questions regarding the appropriateness of this formulation and have explored alternative approaches: see Nozick (1
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:02:17 | 只看該作者
G. M?llhoffis path-breaking contribution, Sen (1970a, 1970b) introduced the first formal formulation of individual rights in social choice theory. Since then, several writers have raised critical questions regarding the appropriateness of this formulation and have explored alternative approaches: see Nozick (1
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:01:23 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 18:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
溆浦县| 庄河市| 盐边县| 黑龙江省| 本溪| 土默特左旗| 辽源市| 博罗县| 县级市| 卢龙县| 惠来县| 濮阳市| 鹤岗市| 乌鲁木齐县| 邛崃市| 宜春市| 新建县| 东光县| 丹凤县| 灵山县| 东海县| 清水县| 余干县| 安新县| 花垣县| 太和县| 墨竹工卡县| 秦安县| 耿马| 吉水县| 岑巩县| 杭锦旗| 衡阳市| 南华县| 嘉荫县| 钟祥市| 台中市| 图们市| 东莞市| 花莲市| 龙泉市|