找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking; Quandaries of Relati Valerie Rosoux,Mark Anstey Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 11477|回復(fù): 62
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:21:49 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking
副標(biāo)題Quandaries of Relati
編輯Valerie Rosoux,Mark Anstey
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/663/662437/662437.mp4
概述Introduces a new conceptual framework on reconciliation as an integral component of peacemaking processes.Builds new bridges between practitioners and international relations scholars using multidisci
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking; Quandaries of Relati Valerie Rosoux,Mark Anstey Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2
描述.This book offers a unique approach to reconciliation as a matter for negotiation, bringing together two bodies of theory in order to offer insights into resolving conflicts and achieving lasting peace. It argues that reconciliation should not be simply accepted as an ‘a(chǎn)greed-upon norm’ within peacemaking processes, but should receive serious attention from belligerents and peace-brokers seeking to end violent conflicts through negotiation..The book explores different meanings the term ‘reconciliation’ might hold for parties in conflict - the end of overt hostilities, a transformation in the quality of relations between warring groups, a vehicle of accountability and punishment of human rights abusers or the means through which they might somehow acquire amnesty, and as a means of atonement and to material reparation. It considers what gives energy to the idea of reconciliation in a conflict situation—why do belligerents become interested in settling their differences and changingtheir attitudes to one another?? Using a range of case studies and thematic discussion, chapters in this book seek to tackle these tough questions from a multidisciplinary perspective.. .Contributions to t
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Reconciliation; Negotiation; Transitional Justice; Peacebuilding; Post-conflict; Conflict Transformation;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62674-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-87368-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-62674-1
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Negotiating Reconciliation in Peacemaking讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:02:56 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:20:31 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:18:01 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:43:51 | 只看該作者
Lessons for Practice,conciliation’ may have different meanings for those participating in such forums. Mechanisms for reconciliation depend on the divergent purposes, philosophies and power of stakeholders in any situation, calling for careful negotiation in the design and management of reconciliation projects.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:54:41 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Negotiating Perilous Relations: Quandaries of Reconciliation,n’ may carry quite diverse expectations across stakeholder groups. In short its practical application requires negotiation. Our focus is on societal rather than individual reconciliation processes. In this introductory chapter we consider the notion of reconciliation, and raise the questions that helped guide the work of contributors.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:05:55 | 只看該作者
Reconciliation and the Land Question in South Africa: A Case for Negotiation?, careful management. This chapter focuses on the South African land issue with consideration to lessons emerging from the experience of other land reform processes in the context of national reconciliation programmes.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:51:49 | 只看該作者
Tensions Between Short Term Outcomes and Long Term Peacebuilding in Post-war Sri Lanka,s and longer term peacebuilding needs as perceived by the different ethnic communities. Without meaningful power sharing reconciliation will remain problematic and the political benefits from other economic and social reforms will be diminished
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:03:30 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:12:45 | 只看該作者
Reconciliation as a Puzzle: Walking Among Definitions,icture of the phenomenon. A certain conceptual vagueness forces us to raise a basic question to avoid any confusion: what are we talking about when we talk about reconciliation? This chapter presents three main approaches to political reconciliation: structural, psycho-social and spiritual.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 16:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
罗平县| 丰城市| 页游| 迁安市| 蓬莱市| 开远市| 睢宁县| 南江县| 甘孜| 开阳县| 南岸区| 灵台县| 托克逊县| 唐河县| 鱼台县| 陵川县| 博野县| 紫云| 克拉玛依市| 武乡县| 苏尼特左旗| 枞阳县| 余干县| 始兴县| 郴州市| 镇雄县| 和政县| 大余县| 和林格尔县| 静安区| 诸暨市| 成武县| 诸城市| 威信县| 招远市| 富源县| 八宿县| 达日县| 巴彦淖尔市| 新竹市| 尼勒克县|