Titlebook: Nazi-Looted Art and the Law; The American Cases Bruce L. Hay Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Restitution.Holocaust.Fore

Halcyon

書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law被引頻次




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law年度引用




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Nazi-Looted Art and the Law讀者反饋學科排名

olfction

太空

撫育

Altmann v. Republic of Austria,hich were later placed in Austrian museums. This chapter examines the adjudication of the case, which resulted in a decision by the United States Supreme Court concerning the retroactive application of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and was eventually concluded through arbitration.

原始

Westfield v. Federal Republic of Germany,ollection in Düsseldorf, which the Nazis confiscated and auctioned off before deporting him to Auschwitz. This chapter examines the adjudication of the case, which presented a series of problems of foreign state immunity.

BOLUS

tenosynovitis

Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art,s way to the Norton Simon Museum in California. This chapter examines the adjudication of the case, which has confronted the courts with a series of problems in constitutional law, conflicts of law, and foreign property law.

蓋他為秘密

Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain and Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation,ch was later sold in the United States and was eventually acquired by the Spanish government and placed in the Thyssen-Bornemisza Museum in Madrid. This chapter examines the adjudication of the case, which raises a host of problems of constitutional law, conflicts of law, and foreign property law.

陰謀

Coronation

Bakalar v. Vavra,passed through Switzerland before being purchased by a collector in New York. This chapter examines the adjudication of the case, which proceeded through several rounds at the trial and appellate levels and raised complex choice-of-law problems as well as tangled factual questions.