Titlebook: Navies in Violent Peace; James Cable Book 1989 Sir James Cable 1989 Arms Control.diplomacy.Irish Republican Army (IRA).management.Proxy wa

gratuity

書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace被引頻次




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace年度引用




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace讀者反饋




書目名稱Navies in Violent Peace讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

充氣球

懶惰人民

Proxy War at Sea,te than it deserved. Getting other people to do the fighting is, after all, the traditional practice of the richer nations. In the eighteenth century, England and France employed soldiers from many different European countries, usually paying the ruler for the use of his subjects. In the nineteenth

聯(lián)合

The Persistence of Gunboat Diplomacy,inal. If limited, war may not involve navies at all and, if it does, their role may only be ancillary or even optional. Proxy war at sea is so far the merest hypothesis. Since 1945 only 25 of the world’s 105 navies have any shadow of a claim to have fought, even fleetingly, a foreign enemy in war at

我不怕犧牲

Gunboat Diplomacy in the 1980s and Beyond,eded to demonstrate the failure of the Argentine Operation Rosario in 1982 (gunboat diplomacy is always accounted a failure if it leads to war); ten days to establish the success of Operation Urgent Fury against Grenada; less than 24 hours to register American acquiescence in Israeli action against

irreparable

Showing the Flag, Dutch ‘to strike flag and lower topsail to the King’s Jack between Finisterre and Norway’.. Not until 1806 was the duty of naval commanders to enforce salutes in the British Seas omitted from the Naval Instructions issued by the Admiralty.. Nor have other nations, in their moments of naval ascendan

CHAFE

restrain

CLOT

HIKE