Titlebook: Natural Selection; Revisiting its Expla Richard G. Delisle Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Natural selection.genetic changes.

relapse

書目名稱Natural Selection影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Natural Selection影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Natural Selection網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Natural Selection網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Natural Selection被引頻次




書目名稱Natural Selection被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Natural Selection年度引用




書目名稱Natural Selection年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Natural Selection讀者反饋




書目名稱Natural Selection讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

cacophony

FIR

heterodox

EXCEL

Inertia, Trend, and Momentum Reconsidered: G. G. Simpson—An Orthogeneticist?t end orthogenesis but rather ended up defending the phenomenon of orthogenesis through the concept of parallelism. I argue that Simpson maintained pluralistic ideas upon including constraints into his evolutionary system as a complementary factor to the argument of natural selection.

粗鄙的人

高射炮

2524-7751 gy is organized around a profound divide: theories relying on strong selective factors and those appealing only to weak ones...If one reads the new analyses presented in this volume by biologists, historians an978-3-030-65538-9978-3-030-65536-5Series ISSN 2524-7751 Series E-ISSN 2524-776X

蕁麻

Introduction: In Search of a New Paradigm for the Development of Evolutionary Biology,toriography. This Introduction calls for a new and more consistent paradigm that would make sense of the overall development of evolutionary biology, one based on a realignment of the alliance between all partners pursuing research in this area.

致命

Cathedrals, Corals and Mycelia: Three Analogies for the History of Evolutionary Biologyd’s static historiographic analogies, I propose an alternative, more flexible, analogy for the humanist historiography of evolutionary biology: the .. In fact, contrary to hierarchical analogies employed by Gould—which emphasize the search for foundations and essences—the metaphorical mycelium inspi

相互影響

Guiding a Train of Discoveries: Charles Darwin, Charles Daubeny, and the Reception of Natural Selectmade a plea for less debate and more scientific inquiry. Although he never gave his full assent to evolution, in 1865 he insisted that even the “most determined opponents” of natural selection ought to admire a theory that had led Darwin to so many invaluable discoveries. Daubeny’s engagement with n