Titlebook: Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories; U. Reyle,C. Rohrer Book 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1988 Parsi

大破壞

書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories被引頻次




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories年度引用




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories讀者反饋




書目名稱Natural Language Parsing and Linguistic Theories讀者反饋學科排名

線

PRO

皮薩

A Natural Language Toolkit: Reconciling Theory with Practice,s various rule types and constraints. Motivated by desire for declarative semantics, the theory defines these as applying simultaneously in the process of licensing local trees. As a result, as far as practical implementations of GPSG are concerned, the theory loses its apparent efficient parsabilit

podiatrist

心胸狹窄

An Efficiency-Oriented LFG Parser,alysis component in a natural language consulting system under development. The implementation of the parser and the grammar development environment has been performed in Interlisp-D on a Lisp machine. The parser covers the various types of equations proposed in LFG (as described in Kaplan/Bresnan 8

receptors

惡名聲

Combining Categorial Grammar and Unification,resulting formalism, dubbed U(nification) C(ategorial) G(rammar) is introduced and applied to a number of linguistic problems, among which Dutch infinitival complements. Thereby it is illustrated in what way the addition of unification to categorial grammar increases its expressive power.

Trochlea

公式

German Word Order and Universal Grammar,cture, and there was no reference at all to grammatical functions like subject and objects, these terms being defined as the NP immediately dominated by S and VP, respectively (cf. e.g. Chomsky 1965). This fundamental claim of early generative grammar had some important implications for the linear o