Titlebook: Nationalism, Transnationalism, and Political Islam; Hizbullah‘s Institut Mohanad Hage Ali Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

anagen

Mohanad Hage Ali definitions, e.g., using Boolean operations to combine multiple selections. Utilizing derived fields, statistical methods, etc., adds a further layer of flexibility to this approach. Using these concepts, it is also possible to integrate feature detection methods from the other chapters of this par

笨拙處理

一起平行

JECT

,The Role of Hizbullah’s Institutions in the Reconstruction of Shi?i Identity,school children, the injured, or the families of Hizbullah ‘martyrs’. Through an analysis of the way Shi?i identification with Hizbullah (as manifest in its institutionalised form) is promoted, the chapter argues that this collective identity is a modern creation, which Hizbullah reinvents for its d

DALLY

,The Reconstructed History of the Lebanese Shi?a, versions). These earlier historical works, especially that of Mohamad Jaber Al Safa (1875–1945), were among the first attempts to establish a Shi?i version of what Makdisi calls Lebanon’s ‘sectarian nationalism’. However, while it is true that certain practices specific to the Shi?a did exist, and

Popcorn

易受刺激

,The Supernatural in Hizbullah’s Identity,ari?ati, a leading ideologue of the Islamic Revolution, wrote extensively against Majlesi and the dissemination of supernatural narratives, denouncing its creation of credulous and malleable individuals.

Cryptic

Transnational ,,where a more inclusive approach is required, such as in the case of the Shi?i Hazaras of Afghanistan. Such tensions between the national and transnational increase in Iran’s neighbouring countries, where a foreign policy based on . outplays ideology, and transnational ideologies and doctrines take o

inveigh

Conclusion,ze and Christian identities in Lebanon have been more pivotal to the definition of the country’s politics and its various forms of nationalism than has the formation of an inclusive Lebanese identity. Makdisi’s research on the development of ‘sectarian nationalism’—he rightly differentiates between