Titlebook: National Administrations in EU Trade Policy; Maintaining the Capa Johan Adriaensen Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s

tornado

書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy被引頻次




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy年度引用




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy年度引用學科排名




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy讀者反饋




書目名稱National Administrations in EU Trade Policy讀者反饋學科排名

Palate

flutter

978-1-349-71451-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

ZEST

細胞學

Book 2016member states’ ability to exert controlover the European Commission during trade negotiations. But what determinesadministrative capacity and how do member states ensure their preferences aredefended during trade negotiations? A combination of qualitative fieldwork and survey-analysisprovides the an

聰明

Conclusion: A Matter of Principals,per reflection. A prospective angle is also useful for looking beyond the empirical ambitions of this book. The final section identifies paths for further research, not only to extend the scope of the initiated research, but also to offer suggestions on how to improve to the applied research design.

FLIC

Book 2016 on their behavior in the Council of Ministers. Through survey data,these findings are further corroborated. The book is aimed at a readershipinterested in EU decision-making, negotiation theory, comparative publicadministration and the international political economy of trade..

MEN

Theoretical Framework,owards the continuous informal interactions between principal and agent is advocated. Similarly, this chapter proposes a focus on administrative capacity, rather than external negotiating context, as a source of information asymmetry. Once these concepts have been refined, the chapter introduces and contextualises the main hypothesis of this book.

dearth

Signalling Control, there is substantive variation in the amount of control member states exert, and that variation may be explained by administrative capacity. This chapter also reveals that respondents’ signalling strategy is not determined by the size of their country but rather by the stage in the negotiating process at which they are particularly active.

戲服

Measuring Administrative Capacity,g the twenty-eight member states. Drawing on the concept of network performance, the chapter introduces a series of propositions that help explain variation in administrative capacity of the member states. The resulting analysis of a sample of nineteen member states confirms many of the observations made in the qualitative fieldwork.