Titlebook: NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes; Acar Kutay Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license

centipede

書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes被引頻次




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes年度引用




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes讀者反饋




書目名稱NGOs, Civil Society and Structural Changes讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

expound

Interpreting with Foucault,groups and the state. This chapter focuses on how Foucault’s legacy can cast light on our understanding of civil society and how social scientists can conduct an alternative political analysis. To that end, the chapter examines how the interplay between knowledge and power affect civil society discourse.

sterilization

Infect

Consequence

舊石器時(shí)代

小說

resistant

Interpreting Civil Society,ce of pure experience and true meaning. The problem with naturalist theories is that they take civil society as an ahistorical phenomenon, a natural object, and a set of citizens’ associations waiting to be involved in governance settings. This presumption leads naturalists to ignore the contextuali

誤傳

coltish

Defining and Constituting NGOs, understood as performative practices. These practices, speech acts, and performative actions are contextualized within scientific theories and the new governance reforms. When scholars and practitioners talk about civil society, they do not use an objective meaning of civil society existing indepen