Titlebook: Myth and Narrative in International Politics; Interpretive Approac Berit Bliesemann de Guevara Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

incompatible

書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics被引頻次




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics年度引用




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics讀者反饋




書目名稱Myth and Narrative in International Politics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Projection

onal politics. From the international communityto warlords, from participation to effectiveness – international politics isreplete with powerful narratives and commonly held beliefs that qualify asmyths. Rebutting the understanding of myth-as-lie, this collection of essaysunearths the ideological, n

Headstrong

chronicle

古老

https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53752-2Myth; international politics; global governance; international relations; interventionism

業(yè)余愛好者

Book 2016 Relations, including warfare, global governance,interventionism, development aid, and statebuilding. The findings challengeconventional assumptions in International Relations, encouraging? academics ?in IR and across a range of different fieldsand disciplines, including development studies, global

Brittle

ernational Relations, including warfare, global governance,interventionism, development aid, and statebuilding. The findings challengeconventional assumptions in International Relations, encouraging? academics ?in IR and across a range of different fieldsand disciplines, including development studies, global 978-1-137-53752-2

清楚

CURT

Legacies and Place Naming: Perspectives from Korea and Japandded legacies and systemic perspectives. Complex post-colonial and post-WWII heritages continue to be shared by Japan and Korea; so disputed toponymies cannot be read in isolation from geopolitics and changing relations between neighbouring states in Northeast Asia including China.

VOK