Titlebook: Microbial Control of Weeds; David O. TeBeest Book 1991 Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc. 1991 Pathogen.agriculture.cell.ecology.epidemiology

AMUSE

書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds被引頻次




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds年度引用




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds讀者反饋




書目名稱Microbial Control of Weeds讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Deduct

e more one might want to ground a study of Renaissance literature in historical awareness or cultural criticism, the more one cannot ignore basic questions such as why—politically, philosophically, psychologically—a culture would develop form and meter so intensely.

agglomerate

異端

大炮

Infirm

反應(yīng)

forced, through unanticipated destabilizations, to reimagine itself. By tracing the early modern human’s inter-animation with print, powder, and compass, Nayar exposes how these technologies assisted in producing new ways of seeing, knowing, and being in the world.978-3-319-96899-5

Chronological

Bravado

David O. TeBeest then to consolidate, a reputation in . to match the example which the great Frisian humanist had estabished during his lifetime. I also argue that this was no disinterested move on Erasmus’s part: that at the height of Erasmus’s own publishing career, Agricola’s reputation served to provide the ins

材料等

Dean W. Gabrielalling into question the so-called ‘scepticism’ of ., but it remains a negative and partial reading. Since the invective, striking out indiscriminately at all the sciences and arts, does not contain “a serious epis-temological analysis,” what are Agrippa‘s intentions? And how can his final categoriz