找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Methods of Legal Reasoning; Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz Brozek Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Epistemology.Linguistic Anal

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 31611|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:01:23 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning
編輯Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz Brozek
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/633/632431/632431.mp4
概述The only book that covers four major philosophies of legal reasoning (logic, analysis, argumentation, hermeneutics).Shows the philosophical basis for any theory of legal reasoning.Reports interdiscipl
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Methods of Legal Reasoning;  Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz Brozek Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Epistemology.Linguistic Anal
描述Anyone reflecting on the methodology of legal reasoning faces a difficult task. The number of methodological theories in jurisprudence and the vast literature on the subject are not the only problems that have to be taken into account. Perhaps the most striking difficulty concerning the methodology of legal argument is the heated debate between jurists, legal theorists and philosophers of law that has been recurring since at least nineteenth century. Therefore a justification is needed for writing yet another book c- cerning the methods of legal reasoning; a book that aims to cover a lot of what has already been proposed in legal theory. We believe that there is such a justification. First, the perspective that we adopt in the present book is unique, at least in some respects. We venture to look at the methodology of legal reasoning “from the outside”, i.e. from a more g- eral, philosophical perspective, while taking into account the “hard re- ity” of law. This perspective enables us to ask questions about the justification for the methods of legal argument presented. Second, we do not want to defend one, paradigmatic conception of legal reasoning. On the contrary, we put forward t
出版日期Book 2006
關(guān)鍵詞Epistemology; Linguistic Analysis; analysis; argue; argumentation theories; dogmatics; hermeneutics; legal
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4939-0
isbn_softcover978-1-4020-4936-1
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-4939-2Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning被引頻次




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning年度引用




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning讀者反饋




書目名稱Methods of Legal Reasoning讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:34:38 | 只看該作者
Methods of Legal Reasoning978-1-4020-4939-2Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:45:17 | 只看該作者
Jerzy Stelmach,Bartosz BrozekThe only book that covers four major philosophies of legal reasoning (logic, analysis, argumentation, hermeneutics).Shows the philosophical basis for any theory of legal reasoning.Reports interdiscipl
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:38:51 | 只看該作者
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/632431.jpg
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:26:08 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:34:11 | 只看該作者
Controversy over Legal Method in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:59:49 | 只看該作者
Methods of Legal Reasoning from a Postmodern Perspective,
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:14:36 | 只看該作者
Book 2006ical perspective, while taking into account the “hard re- ity” of law. This perspective enables us to ask questions about the justification for the methods of legal argument presented. Second, we do not want to defend one, paradigmatic conception of legal reasoning. On the contrary, we put forward t
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:26:44 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:50:11 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 13:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
儋州市| 通化市| 台东县| 育儿| 鸡西市| 云梦县| 理塘县| 太谷县| 玉龙| 民乐县| 甘洛县| 蒲城县| 承德县| 防城港市| 荣成市| 达拉特旗| 盐源县| 翁牛特旗| 铜川市| 梧州市| 长治县| 夹江县| 通化市| 茌平县| 阿图什市| 托里县| 安徽省| 自贡市| 五寨县| 五河县| 怀宁县| 简阳市| 平远县| 江油市| 五华县| 祁门县| 教育| 重庆市| 武汉市| 老河口市| 长汀县|