Titlebook: Metaphor and Analogy in the Sciences; Fernand Hallyn Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 object.reason.science

吊胃口

Arroyo

Analogies and Metaphors in Kepler, and even more so in the imaginary of sciences, be it within a context of discovery or of justification. It suffices to consult the most frequently used terms (electrical ., magnetic ., light ., magnetic .) to be confronted with the ubiquity of metaphor and analogy.

山頂可休息

ingenue

誓言

Conceptual Metaphor and the Embodied Mind: What Makes Mathematics Possible?,eptual systems. Ever since Aristotle, and later, through the legacy of Descartes and Leibniz, human thought was considered to be rational, conscious, monolithic, consistent, literal, and based on universal disembodied abstract laws. This long-lasting view, however, is now untenable in the light of r

Dedication

Metaphor and Scientific Creativity,. Clearly metaphors fit in well here because this is their task. And a difficult one at that because their cross-domain mappings are not at all straightforward, since the domains involved are rich in complexity and are partially represented in non-propositional modes of thought, such as mental image

協(xié)議

協(xié)迫

Scientific Models as Metaphors,m Max Black’s interaction view of metaphor.and is strongly associated with Mary Hesse’s seminal work ‘Models and Analogies in Science’.. The metaphor idea also features prominently in Rom Harré’s work on scientific models.. It is my aim in this paper to test the hypothesis that scientific models are

挖掘

CAJ