找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Metaepistemology; Realism and Anti-Rea Christos Kyriacou,Robin McKenna Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 epist

[復制鏈接]
查看: 47096|回復: 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:45:03 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Metaepistemology
副標題Realism and Anti-Rea
編輯Christos Kyriacou,Robin McKenna
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/632/631332/631332.mp4
概述Offers the first dedicated study on the core metaepistemological subject of epistemic ontology.Brings together a wide range of different philosophical perspectives on epistemic ontology, ranging from
叢書名稱Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy
圖書封面Titlebook: Metaepistemology; Realism and Anti-Rea Christos Kyriacou,Robin McKenna Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 epist
描述This book contains twelve chapters by leading and up-and-coming philosophers on metaepistemology, that is, on the nature, existence and authority of epistemic facts. One of the central divides in metaepistemology is between epistemic realists and epistemic anti-realists. Epistemic realists think that epistemic facts (such as the fact that you ought to believe what your evidence supports) exist independently of human judgements and practices, and that they have authority over our judgements and practices. Epistemic anti-realists think that, if epistemic facts exist at all, they are grounded in human judgements and practices, and gain any authority they have from our judgements and practices. This book considers both epistemic realist and anti-realist perspectives, as well as perspectives that ‘transcend‘ the realism/anti-realism dichotomy. As such, it constitutes the ‘state of the art‘ with regard to metaepistemology, and will shape the debate in years to come..
出版日期Book 2018
關(guān)鍵詞epistemic ontology; metaepistemology; epistemic facts; antirealism; metaethics; moral ontology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93369-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-06648-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-93369-6Series ISSN 2946-2851 Series E-ISSN 2946-286X
issn_series 2946-2851
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Metaepistemology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Metaepistemology影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Metaepistemology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Metaepistemology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Metaepistemology被引頻次




書目名稱Metaepistemology被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Metaepistemology年度引用




書目名稱Metaepistemology年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Metaepistemology讀者反饋




書目名稱Metaepistemology讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:58:39 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:43:45 | 只看該作者
Epistemic Reductionism and the Moral-Epistemic Disparitytemic reductionism and of the moral-epistemic disparity has been criticized by Richard Rowland (2013) and Terence Cuneo and Christos Kyriacou (2018). This paper aims to rebut these criticisms and, more generally, to clarify and strengthen the case for epistemic reductionism and the moral-epistemic disparity.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:28:30 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:10:51 | 只看該作者
Reasons Primitivism and Epistemic Expressivismivism fails quite generally. I propose that reasons primitivists can make sense of this evidential constraint on reasons for belief if they adopt a suitable expressivist account of reasons judgements. I conclude by briefly considering a metaphysical version of Smith’s argument.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:47:53 | 只看該作者
Introduction,onnections and analogies with metaethical debates (e.g. parity and disparity arguments). We then show that this volume presents new cutting-edge work that advances metaepistemology and go on to briefly summarise the content of the rest of the volume.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:17:04 | 只看該作者
From , Fixed Points to , Fixed Pointsy and can be utilised to address important challenges to epistemic realism. I conclude that insofar as we have some reason to postulate moral fixed points, we have equal reason to postulate epistemic fixed points.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:10:00 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:59:30 | 只看該作者
Constitutivism About Epistemic Normativityms about the relation between accepting a norm and being motivated by it. This point has sometimes been made in connection with the transparency of belief. But its development and application to Moore-paradoxical sentences are, we believe, novel.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:59:51 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 09:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
满城县| 三台县| 奉节县| 桃江县| 合江县| 定边县| 通州市| 百色市| 习水县| 祥云县| 正宁县| 柞水县| 滁州市| 金平| 岚皋县| 周宁县| 滦平县| 靖远县| 浪卡子县| 德钦县| 绥棱县| 神木县| 抚顺市| 海口市| 崇明县| 南充市| 新巴尔虎左旗| 神池县| 竹北市| 莲花县| 霍山县| 亚东县| 万荣县| 额济纳旗| 宝丰县| 兰州市| 蓝田县| 渝北区| 广宁县| 湟中县| 板桥市|