Titlebook: Mental Retardation and Sterilization; A Problem of Compete Ruth Macklin,Willard Gaylin Book 1981 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1

Negotiate

駕駛

Involuntary Sterilization and the Rights of the Mildly Retardeds in different states, noting a lack of a consistent moral or philosophical point of view. The question of whether or not involuntary sterilization ought to be allowed under . circumstances was broached, revealing a number of differences of opinion among the group members as to the possible existenc

Cloudburst

backdrop

Options for the Futureed in this book cannot be fully resolved. The debate between those who believe that the mildly retarded do differ behaviorally as a class, and therefore require paternalistic protection, and those who believe that the mildly retarded do not differ significantly enough from persons of normal intellig

拱墻

Consensus

The Bright Man’s Burdenthe decision to marry, to have children, to enter into financial contracts, and to live alone. Generally speaking, adults of normal intelligence may make these decisions without obtaining the consent of anyone, and they value this autonomy. When persons of normal intelligence, acting through the sta

朋黨派系

Voluntary and Involuntary Sterilizationeugenic-sterilization statute in 1907. However, the practice did not become widespread until the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of such statutes in 1927. The Court held that a Virginia statute did not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Justice Oliver Wen

蚊帳

松雞

Bother