找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery; An Egalitarian Appro Duff R. Waring Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004 bioethics.et

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 54239|回復(fù): 50
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:05:09 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery
副標(biāo)題An Egalitarian Appro
編輯Duff R. Waring
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/630/629121/629121.mp4
概述One of the few books that attempts a sustained defence of random patient selection.Combines ethics and political philosophy in its novel and strict egalitarian approach to patient selection for transp
叢書(shū)名稱International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery; An Egalitarian Appro Duff R. Waring Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004 bioethics.et
描述.Bioethicists, moral philosophers and social policy analysts have long debated about how we should decide who shall be saved with scarce, lifesaving resources when not all can be saved. It is often claimed that it is fairer to save younger persons and that age is an ethically relevant consideration in such tragic decisions. Medical benefit should be maximized and final selection should aim to minimize the contaminating influence of chance. These claims are challenged by Duff R. Waring in .Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery., one of the few books that attempts a sustained defence of random patient selection. ..This book combines ethics and political philosophy in its novel and strict egalitarian approach to patient selection for transplantable organs. Waring addresses the question of whether we should choose between lives on the basis of fair chances or best outcomes. He argues that final selection criteria should be based on fair chances that equalize opportunity as opposed to best outcomes. His defence of "hardy" egalitarianism aims to show that random selection by lottery can affirm both a common humanity and the equal value of lives. The notion of patient selection by lottery
出版日期Book 2004
關(guān)鍵詞bioethics; ethics; Ethos; morality; philosophy; political philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2973-8
isbn_softcover978-90-481-6756-2
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-2973-8Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
issn_series 1567-8008
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2004
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:39:26 | 只看該作者
Medical Benefit and the Human Lottery978-1-4020-2973-8Series ISSN 1567-8008 Series E-ISSN 2351-955X
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:17:46 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2973-8bioethics; ethics; Ethos; morality; philosophy; political philosophy
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:46:27 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:39:58 | 只看該作者
International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicinehttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/629121.jpg
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:36:13 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:54:21 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:35:43 | 只看該作者
Fair Innings and Need over a Lifetime,well-being argument.” The second version is that these age-based limits can be defended on the grounds that, insofar as possible, there should be an equal opportunity to live to the same age as others. We can refer to this version as the “equal opportunity to live to the same age as others” argument.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:02:27 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:23:17 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 22:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
许昌市| 夹江县| 武宣县| 汉沽区| 宁远县| 石门县| 绵阳市| 嘉禾县| 孟州市| 克山县| 南召县| 慈溪市| 女性| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 鲁山县| 汝州市| 同心县| 福建省| 土默特右旗| 襄城县| 古浪县| 上蔡县| 五大连池市| 广宗县| 红原县| 五台县| 龙川县| 高台县| 武川县| 忻城县| 六枝特区| 霍邱县| 通海县| 翁牛特旗| 合作市| 鹤岗市| 乌海市| 天镇县| 牡丹江市| 浠水县| 田阳县|