Titlebook: Media Governance; A Cosmopolitan Criti Sarah Anne Ganter,Hanan Badr Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

古生物學

書目名稱Media Governance影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Media Governance影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Media Governance網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Media Governance網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Media Governance被引頻次




書目名稱Media Governance被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Media Governance年度引用




書目名稱Media Governance年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Media Governance讀者反饋




書目名稱Media Governance讀者反饋學科排名

dictator

拍翅

facetious

2634-5978 tributes to the De-Westernization of Media and Communication.The book offers a critical map to navigate the field of media governance. A thread of cosmopolitan critique connects the fourteen chapters to enhance media governance literature beyond the West and regional foci. The first part addresses t

下邊深陷

Challenges of Media Governance and Media Policy in Latin America: In the Context of Media Reform Batand final remarks are presented regarding media policy and governance perspectives in Latin America. Thus, this chapter highlights the benefits of using the PEC perspective .o study media governance practices and processes in the region.

不易燃

Media Governance as a Utopian Concept in a Local Mediascape: Challenges for Conceptual Development i offers an integrated view of utopianism embedded in the unclear boundaries between the media, the Internet, and the platforms by focusing on the gray areas formed by the transitions among them. The chapter concludes by determining what is currently missing in Korean media governance based on the cases analyzed throughout the chapter.

predict

Deliberative Policy Ecology Approach: Media Policy Studies from South Asiah is placed in dialogue with the cosmopolitan approach to media governance that the editors of this volume present, in order?to understand commonalities and divergences. Importantly, the DPE Approach contributes to a possible Sustainable Media Governance, especially as a Southern and decolonial approach to its study and praxes.

Barter

,Introduction: Re-examining Media Governance Through?Cosmopolitan Critique, academic work across gender, class, race, and geographies (Masiero et al. 2021; Badr and Elmaghraby 2021; Adjin-Tettey 2020). In this climate, even though it might be easier to remain in what Waisbord (2019) described as “silos” of academia, it is even more important to insist on and reinforce inte

商業(yè)上

accrete

Media Governance as Diagnostic Lens to Probe Hidden Dimensions of Authoritarian Decision-Making in td diverse subsystems addressed by the wider notion of governance on the one hand and the highly controlled and centralised political systems of the Middle East on the other. Yet informal regulatory mechanisms and practices form common ground between governance theory and observable processes affecti