找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: World Court Digest 2001 - 2005; Armin Bogdandy,Rüdiger Wolfrum Book 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 Diplomacy.Dispute Settleme

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Spring
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:54:21 | 只看該作者
Violations of International Law and Responsibility of Statesson with the Congo‘s failure to comply with its obligation under Article 146 of the IVth Geneva Convention (investigating and prosecuting charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on its territory). The Congo did not come to the International Court with clean hands, and its Application should have been rejected. ..
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:20:06 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:21:49 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:36:16 | 只看該作者
Law of the Seadelimitation to be carried out will be one between the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone belonging to each of the Parties, areas in which States have only sovereign rights and functional jurisdiction. Thus both Parties have differentiated between a southern and a northern sector.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:10:12 | 只看該作者
Self–Determination no matter how persuasively claimed on the basis of old legal instruments and exercises of authority, cannot - except in the most extraordinary circumstances - prevail in law over the rights of non–self–governing people to claim independence and establish their sovereignty through the exercise of bona fide self–determination.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 01:56:07 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:34:08 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:10:23 | 只看該作者
Law of Treatiession of the understanding of the parties at the time of signature. In the circumstances of this case the Court has come to the conclusion that the Anglo–Ottoman Convention does represent evidence of the views of Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire as to the factual extent of the authority of the Al–Thani Ruler in Qatar up to 1913.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:54:29 | 只看該作者
Human Rightse right under Article 36 as a human right renders the effectiveness of this provision even more imperative”. The Court having found that the United States violated the rights accorded by Article 36, paragraph 1, to the LaGrand brothers, it does not appear necessary to it to consider the additional argument developed by Germany in this regard.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:26:22 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 09:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
柏乡县| 宁安市| 焦作市| 葫芦岛市| 上栗县| 客服| 保定市| 长白| 青岛市| 澄城县| 佛山市| 吴川市| 德清县| 行唐县| 神木县| 华坪县| 新宁县| 东山县| 鲁甸县| 康保县| 揭东县| 古交市| 新泰市| 临江市| 石河子市| SHOW| 大庆市| 郧西县| 东乡族自治县| 精河县| 南康市| 抚顺县| 临城县| 新泰市| 临海市| 哈密市| 舒兰市| 稷山县| 阿荣旗| 铜鼓县| 晴隆县|