找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: World Court Digest 2001 - 2005; Armin Bogdandy,Rüdiger Wolfrum Book 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 Diplomacy.Dispute Settleme

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Spring
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:54:21 | 只看該作者
Violations of International Law and Responsibility of Statesson with the Congo‘s failure to comply with its obligation under Article 146 of the IVth Geneva Convention (investigating and prosecuting charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on its territory). The Congo did not come to the International Court with clean hands, and its Application should have been rejected. ..
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:20:06 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:21:49 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 19:36:16 | 只看該作者
Law of the Seadelimitation to be carried out will be one between the continental shelf and exclusive economic zone belonging to each of the Parties, areas in which States have only sovereign rights and functional jurisdiction. Thus both Parties have differentiated between a southern and a northern sector.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:10:12 | 只看該作者
Self–Determination no matter how persuasively claimed on the basis of old legal instruments and exercises of authority, cannot - except in the most extraordinary circumstances - prevail in law over the rights of non–self–governing people to claim independence and establish their sovereignty through the exercise of bona fide self–determination.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 01:56:07 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:34:08 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 10:10:23 | 只看該作者
Law of Treatiession of the understanding of the parties at the time of signature. In the circumstances of this case the Court has come to the conclusion that the Anglo–Ottoman Convention does represent evidence of the views of Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire as to the factual extent of the authority of the Al–Thani Ruler in Qatar up to 1913.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:54:29 | 只看該作者
Human Rightse right under Article 36 as a human right renders the effectiveness of this provision even more imperative”. The Court having found that the United States violated the rights accorded by Article 36, paragraph 1, to the LaGrand brothers, it does not appear necessary to it to consider the additional argument developed by Germany in this regard.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:26:22 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 11:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
临武县| 宾阳县| 陇川县| 刚察县| 昌平区| 河北省| 孝义市| 瓮安县| 黄陵县| 加查县| 大城县| 马关县| 什邡市| 汤阴县| 当涂县| 衡山县| 土默特左旗| 曲阜市| 克山县| 乐山市| 孝义市| 夹江县| 伊金霍洛旗| SHOW| 闵行区| 璧山县| 金寨县| 阿克苏市| 祁阳县| 遵义市| 阳高县| 宕昌县| 安泽县| 黑龙江省| 宾阳县| 桦甸市| 吉林市| 花莲县| 定边县| 禄劝| 都兰县|