Titlebook: Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918; Heather Ellis Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Natural scienc

萬圣節(jié)

書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918被引頻次




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918年度引用




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918讀者反饋




書目名稱Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831–1918讀者反饋學科排名

Pruritus

縱欲

,The Changing Public Image of the ‘Man of Science’, 1600–1830,cal history of masculine reason’.. Since the early 1980s, there has been much brilliant work by feminist and women’s historians seeking to recapture the forgotten role of women in science and to expose the construction of artificial narratives of female inferiority.. Although the . of science themse

記憶法

The Decline of the British Association? Marginalization, Masculinity and Marconi,ley wrote, ‘the whole choir of cosmical sciences have acquired a soundness, severity, and fullness, which render them … as valuable to a manly mind as Mathematics and Metaphysics.’. Likewise, David Brewster, in an article for the ., written to celebrate twenty years of the BAAS, argued that the peac

釘牢

Book 2017 of the naturalphilosopher with the reclusive scholar, to early nineteenth-century attemptsto reinvent the scientist as a fashionable gentleman, to his subsequentreimagining as the epitome of Victorian moral earnestness and meritocracy,Heather Ellis analyzes the complex and changing public image of

magenta

Book 2017n. Focusing onthe British Association for the Advancement of Science, founded in 1831, itexplores the complex and dynamic shifts in the public image of the British‘man of science’ and questions thestatus of the natural scientist as a modern masculine hero. Until now, sciencehas been examined by cult

miscreant

New Masculine Heroes: Davy, Bacon and the Construction of the Gentleman-Scientist,nsformation’ in the development of the identity of the male scientist. Stressing in particular, the influence of Romanticism, Golinski writes that, ‘[t]he years around the turn of the nineteenth century brought to prominence models of male creativity that stressed imagination and the emotions, rather than classical rationality’..

instill

Thomas Carlyle, the X-Club and the Hero as Man of Science,tation of the character and career of the chief historical hero of the British Association—Francis Bacon himself. To emphasize his status as a celibate monk (a fact the BAAS certainly avoided), Bowden referred to him as ‘Friar Bacon’ and described his life as a ‘solitary student, wasting the midnight oil in his cloister’..

商店街

Reuniting Theory and Practice: The Man of Science and the First World War,cal research’. In the popular press, this distinction, as we have seen, placed them squarely in the space of the laboratory away from the world. Thus, more so arguably than in the early days of the Association, the man of science was equated with the figure of the isolated scholar.

Crumple

2730-9479 mage of the British ‘man of science‘.Analyses the constructi.This bookoffers the first in-depth study of the masculine self-fashioning of scientificpractitioners in nineteenth and early twentieth-century Britain. Focusing onthe British Association for the Advancement of Science, founded in 1831, ite