Titlebook: Marx’s Not-Capital; Labour and the Conte Benjamin Tetler Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license

JAR

書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital被引頻次




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital年度引用




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital讀者反饋




書目名稱Marx’s Not-Capital讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Champion

不理會(huì)

Benjamin TetlerExamines whether and how Marx’s concept of labor as not-capital can contribute to the critique of political economy.Establishes that Marx’s value theory requires a negative conception of labour.Argues

essential-fats

都相信我的話

intrude

親密

Systematic Dialectic of the Value-Form: Christopher Arthur,t while Arthur’s homology between capital as subject and Hegel’s Geist certainly captures theperverse nature of capitalist social relations to the extent that it grasps the manner in which abstract social forms dominatesociety in its current state, it does so at the cost of losing the radical root o

CAPE

,The ‘Critique of Labour’: Moishe Postone, ,, John Holloway, political economy. A critique of Moishe Postone’s (and Robert Kurz’s/Wertkritik’s) value theory is developed that draws on key components of the Neue Marx-Lektüre, a reconstruction of Marx’s critique that demonstrates the necessarily monetary nature of Marx’s value theory. Postone’s (and Kurz’s/Wer

谷物

Breach

Conclusion: The Limits to Not-Capital,e between the Grundrisse, where they first appear, and Capital, where they are apparently dropped. It shows that while what Marx intended with these notions in the earlier text is retained, the later presentation is undertaken at a higher level of conceptual sophistication, such that they no longer