Titlebook: Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain; One Hundred Years La Robert Kilroy Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Duchamp.Founta

胃口

書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain被引頻次




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain年度引用




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain讀者反饋




書目名稱Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Verify

Art History and Psychoanalysis Todayquiry: an interrogation of Duchamp’s oeuvre on the basis of Lacanian psychoanalysis and an exploration of the precise influence of Courbet on Duchamp. To pursue this aim, the author builds on the work of two Duchampian scholars who have rigorously engaged with Lacan’s conceptual apparatus: Rosalind

Infantry

浮雕寶石

verdict

Proponent

The Artistcreate “art” is, in fundamental human terms, a struggle to realize his identity as “artist,” to be recognized as a genius. This subjective process takes place at the basic level of language as an effort to declaratively mark one’s position in the aesthetic field. What Duchamp terms the “art coeffici

Wallow

The Onlookertion of the exhibition space in aestheticizing the object. The operation of display, Duchamp argues, produces what he terms a phenomenon of “transubstantiation”: a piece of inert matter is magically transformed into a work of art on the basis of a fundamental illusion. It is argued that, with ., Duc

dermatomyositis

debunk

鋸齒狀

Posterity the creative act, this spectator overlooks the artificial nature of the tasty affairs and presents the movement or “ism” as an objective, naturally occurring phenomenon. In doing so, he consolidates the validity of the “immediate spectator’s” initial verdict. To demonstrate this point, Duchamp dire