Titlebook: Making Moral Decisions; An Existential Analy Louis O. Kattsoff Book 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1965 Emotivism.Hedonism.U

聲明

nonradioactive

Motives and Consequences,cisions. In all the preceding pages there has been a constant appeal to consequences and occasionally to motives. In judging, for example, whether it was right to expose the abortionist consideration was given to the effect of exposure on the various people involved. In arguing whether or not it is

Ceramic

Affection

Justifying Moral Principles,y is raised. But what is the source, if there is any, from which the authority of the moral principle flows? If one believes that one ought to obey God’s will, then to demonstrate that to be honest is to act in accord with the divine will is to show why one ought to be honest, even if one isn’t. The

完全

Nature of Moral Statements,r type of statement. It should be quite evident that the deliberations we are about to undertake are very important. The intelligent person most assuredly is curious about his moral utterances. He not only wants to know how to make moral decisions, but he desires to understand the significance of th

結構

Moral Disagreements and Their Resolution, and that moral disagreements should be easily resolvable. Yet it is terribly clear that just the opposite is the case. Making moral decisions remains an extraordinarily difficult task at times and moral controversies rage on without anyone being able to offer a solution. Is it or is it not immoral

Inordinate

Host142

overshadow

污穢