找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City; A Hollow Legacy? Phil Cohen,Paul Watt Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 14840|回復(fù): 55
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:08:39 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City
副標(biāo)題A Hollow Legacy?
編輯Phil Cohen,Paul Watt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/589/588479/588479.mp4
概述Provides critical analysis of the successes and failures of the London 2012 Olympics.Compares how the 2012 Olympic Games differ from previous and planned Olympic mega-events in similar host cities.Que
圖書封面Titlebook: London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City; A Hollow Legacy? Phil Cohen,Paul Watt Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201
描述This book brings together a body of new research which looks both backwards and forwards to consider how far the London 2012 Olympic legacy has been delivered and how far it has been a hollow promise. Cohen and Watt consider the lessons that can be learnt from the London experience and aptly apply them other host cities, specifically Rio 2016 and Tokyo 2020. The Olympics are often described as a ‘mega-event’ in a way that assumes the host cities have no other existence outside, before or beyond the contexts imposed by the Games themselves. In terms of regeneration, the London 2012 Olympics promised to trigger a mega-regeneration project that was different to what had come before. This time the mistakes of other large-scale projects like London Docklands and Canary Wharf would be put right: top-down planning would be replaced by civic participation, communication and ‘the local’. This edited collection questions how far the 2012 London legacy really is different. In so doing, it bringsfresh evidence, original insights and new perspectives to bear on the post-Olympics debate. A detailed and well-researched study, this book will be of great interest to scholars of urban geography, soc
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞housing; olympic games; redevelopment; house prices; gentrification; sport; urban inequality; community; Eas
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48947-0
isbn_softcover978-1-349-69619-2
isbn_ebook978-1-137-48947-0
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City被引頻次




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City年度引用




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City讀者反饋




書目名稱London 2012 and the Post-Olympics City讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:06:08 | 只看該作者
Hollow Sovereignty and the Hollow Crown? Contested Governance and the Olympic Security Edificein London. It examines imbrications of formal security plans, comprising state and private sector actors and agencies, with more indirect and informal securitising processes such as diverse territorially based regulatory regimes and the creation of ‘regenerated’ spaces that are hardened and insulate
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:59:15 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:44:37 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:20:03 | 只看該作者
‘The Best New Place to Live’? Visual Research with Residents in East Village and E20g and critical alternative to official hegemonic representations of the London Olympic and Paralympic legacy as variant viewpoints disrupt ideas of an objective representation, a coherent community and a definitive place. The images locate lived relations of place within wider socio-spatial relation
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:08:36 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:50:07 | 只看該作者
Contesting Community on London 2012’s Olympic Fringemmunity’ been written into the planning of Olympic-led regeneration? How do London 2012 authorities define ‘community’? How has community rhetoric changed since the bid was won in 2005? Have formal definitions been contested at ground level? These questions are explored within the neighbourhood of H
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:37:53 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:49:45 | 只看該作者
Youth Transitions and Legacies in an East London Olympic Host Boroughparison to their peers in the rest of London. This chapter will explore post-16 transitions in East London within the social policy context of urban regeneration delivered through a myriad of government-led initiatives, not least the London 2012 Olympic project. Lastly, it will review the post-2012
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:18:20 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 14:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
思茅市| 开阳县| 越西县| 南漳县| 房产| 浦县| 德庆县| 建湖县| 上犹县| 乐昌市| 曲麻莱县| 阳东县| 新化县| 昌吉市| 徐汇区| 英德市| 霍州市| 南投市| 濉溪县| 江津市| 赣榆县| 隆尧县| 攀枝花市| 来安县| 临西县| 仙桃市| 承德县| 新营市| 青铜峡市| 万山特区| 张家港市| 汽车| 长阳| 桑日县| 靖安县| 禹城市| 陆川县| 砀山县| 定边县| 伽师县| 库伦旗|