Titlebook: Logic, Language, and Probability; A Selection of Paper Radu J. Bogdan,Ilkka Niiniluoto Book 1973 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, H

鳴叫大步走

書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability被引頻次




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability年度引用




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability讀者反饋




書目名稱Logic, Language, and Probability讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Noctambulant

Intensional Descriptions and Relative Completeness in the General Interpreted Modal Calculus MCvs the main results of Memoir 3 in Bressan’s book (1972). The same communication was essentially based on some results that were presented at the analogue of the above congress in 1964 (Jerusalem). and constitutes the main achievements of Memoir 1 (and some of Memoir 2) in Bressan (1972). Therefore h

indecipherable

Singular Terms and Statements of Identity Those constituted by two singular terms coupled by ‘is’ have been of particular interest as possible counterexamples to the unrestricted applicability of the traditional subject-predicate analysis. Do they belong to a special category of statements of identity? Or are we to countenance the predicab

Ordeal

cumulative

On the Causal Structure of Random Processesetween them. Among the different types of relations already known, the causal is one of the most important, as it makes possible to find the origin of a phenomenon, to predict a future one or even to reproduce it.

thrombus

The Paradox of Anomalyequirement that if such an analysis purports to explicate the concept of confirmation or support which is in common use in natural science it must be capable of explicating or elucidating the concept of what scientists call an ‘a(chǎn)nomaly’.

很像弓]

Evidence and Conceptual Changee is selected as evidence on our account will be determined by the subjective probability of the sentence and of the sentences with which it competes for evidential status. Both the subjective probability of a sentence and what sentences it competes with will depend on the conceptual and semantic re

parsimony

Empirically Trivial Theories and Inductive Systematizationry having no non-tautological deductive observational consequences cannot achieve any inductive systematization among observational statements. This claim has been made by Bohnert (1968, p. 280), Hooker (1968, p. 157–158), Stegmiiller (1970, pp. 423, 428–429), and Cornman (1973), for the purpose of

都相信我的話

音樂等

Prediction, Complexity, and Randomnessspicuous explorations of the notion of complexity besides the common statements about the feeling that some new phenomena will emerge given some sufficiently complex system. . is bound both to factual issues and to epistemological issues. Von Neumann never formulated it explicitly but a fair renderi