找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Logic in Law; Remarks on Logic and Arend Soeteman Book 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989 Legal Logic.deontic logic.formal

[復制鏈接]
查看: 27933|回復: 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:04:40 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Logic in Law
副標題Remarks on Logic and
編輯Arend Soeteman
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/589/588025/588025.mp4
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Logic in Law; Remarks on Logic and Arend Soeteman Book 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989 Legal Logic.deontic logic.formal
描述The study presented in this book was entered upon by me from a legal point of view. ‘Legal logic‘ has been known for a long time, concerning itself with the methodology of legal and in particular judicial reasoning. In modern days, however, this ‘legal logic‘ is sometimes also connected with modern formal logic, as it has been developed in the works of G. Boole, A. de Morgan, G. Frege, C.S. Peirce, E. Schroder, G. Peano, A.N. Whitehead, B. Russell and others. For me this gave rise to the as yet not very specific question about the meaning of modern symbolic logic for law. Already in an early stage it appeared that, although traditional legal logic and modern symbolic logic both concern logic, this may not create the misapprehension that a similar matter is at issue. Both concern themselves (among other things) with reasonings and reasoning. Traditional legal logic is, however, as it was said by the German legal theoretician K. Engisch: "a material logic that wants us to reflect on what we have to do if we -within the limits of actual possibility- wish to reach true, or at least correct judgements" (Engisch, 1964, p.5). Modern symbolic logic on the other hand is not concerned with t
出版日期Book 1989
關(guān)鍵詞Legal Logic; deontic logic; formal logic; logic; symbolic logic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7821-9
isbn_softcover978-90-481-4035-0
isbn_ebook978-94-015-7821-9Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Logic in Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Logic in Law影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Logic in Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Logic in Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Logic in Law被引頻次




書目名稱Logic in Law被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Logic in Law年度引用




書目名稱Logic in Law年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Logic in Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Logic in Law讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:10:49 | 只看該作者
Arend Soetemane interessieren sich für die mechanischen Eigenschaften eines “Geomaterials” und verstehen unter ?Boden“ alle Lockergesteine (Prinz 1991). Im Gegensatz dazu stehen die Festgesteine (?Fels“), die bei 12-stündiger Wasserlagerung weder zerfallen noch an der Oberfl?che aufweichen (DIN 4022). Die Bodenku
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:52:57 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:03:44 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:15:18 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:56:13 | 只看該作者
Arend Soetemanschwindigkeit im südlichen Ostseeraum von einer Vielzahl von Randbedingungen abh?ngt, insbesondere dabei — au?er von Fetchl?nge und Exposition — vor allem von der Intensit?t der Meeresspiegel?nderungen sowie neotektonischer Senkungs- und glazialisostatischer Ausgleichsbewegungen und dem Charakter de
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:07:34 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:35:08 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:56:12 | 只看該作者
The Possibility of Deontic Logic,is ‘no longer self-evident that logic presents a possibility for normative reasoning’. This is connected with the fact that, if normative judgements cannot be derived from factual judgements, it is no longer self-evident that those normative judgements can be either true of false.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:14:51 | 只看該作者
Prolegomena for a Deontic Logic,is question, it is not totally unimportant what interpretations are given to the logical values 1 and 0: different interpretations may sometimes lead to a different formal system. It is therefore not without reason that the examination for the most preferable interpretation can be reckoned among the
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 13:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
铜川市| 潍坊市| 六安市| 大英县| 宁明县| 射阳县| 枝江市| 凤城市| 白朗县| 伊通| 安化县| 临泽县| 同心县| 酉阳| 肇源县| 洪洞县| 庆阳市| 台江县| 黎平县| 河西区| 石棉县| 宁安市| 惠来县| 信丰县| 黄陵县| 射阳县| 汝阳县| 定西市| 略阳县| 夏河县| 汪清县| 浏阳市| 沿河| 呼和浩特市| 潼南县| 蒲城县| 黎城县| 高州市| 独山县| 噶尔县| 湘潭县|