Titlebook: Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie; G. H. Wright Book 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague 1980 epistemology.interpre

Daidzein

書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie被引頻次




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie年度引用




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie讀者反饋




書目名稱Logic and Philosophy / Logique et Philosophie讀者反饋學科排名

frenzy

允許

Intuitionistic Logic: A Philosophical Challenge, In our deductive practice, we take, in fact, a stand on this conflict; even if we try to reconcile the two logics, our actual reasoning will usually show a clear preference for one of them. In philosophy, furthermore, we should reflect on our deductive practice and should be able to formulate explicitly what kind of reasoning is correct.

hysterectomy

myriad

On Certainty, Evidence and Probability,hisholm which are referred to in his present one, so that I cannot exclude that answers to some of my questions might be found there. It seems useful, however, to raise these questions at least in order to make his present paper more self-contained.

Generalize

Trochlea

Two Successor Concepts to the Notion of Statistical Explanation,f philosophers of science who believe that we should try to explicate all important metascientific notions, like “theory,” “disposition,” “l(fā)aw,” “confirmation” or “corroboration” and, of course, “explanation,” on the abstract level of general philosophy of science. This attitude mirrors the conviction that such explications are possible.

Leaven

,Comment on “Some Remarks on Statistical Explanations” by Professor Suppes,under discussion. If I am right it is not so much a contrast of views on particular items, nontechnical or technical ones, as a difference in philosophical attitude to questions in the philosophy of science. I therefore hope that some additional remarks will help to clarify the issue.

Abutment

NIP

Epistemic Reasoning and the Logic of Epistemic Concepts,ity. The other is to view it as a branch of the logic of preferability. In the present paper, I will take the second approach, making use of the following concepts: (a) .; (b) . necessity; (c) ., or .; and (d) ., or belief