找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Logic Counts; Ewa ?arnecka-Bia?y Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Aristotle.Plato.logic.philosophy.truth

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: endocarditis
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:59:58 | 只看該作者
Ontologies and Ontologicscal analysis leads to rather troublesome questions: Are philosophical disciplines methodologically and/or essentially related and connected? Are particular philosophical disciplines scientific? And, if the answer is not definite, to what extent is this so? Do philosophical disciplines form a uniform
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:19:53 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:08:16 | 只看該作者
Two Levels of Modality: An Algebraic Approachlogics, namely those associated with algebraic models. It is an attempt to study modal logics within the framework of the theory of abstract logics. We begin by recalling some terms, constructions and notations, mainly taken from Brown & Suszko (1973).
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:40:26 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:20:57 | 只看該作者
When May G. E. Moore’s Definition of Internal Relation be Used Rationally?n controversy over the nature of relations. The author of that definition was right in his claim that the sense he established was metaphysically neutral for its serviceability in expressing each of the three positions to be separated in the dispute. Neohegelians saying that every relation is intern
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:07:54 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:07:15 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:43:58 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:58:02 | 只看該作者
Basic Norm and Metalanguage. Historical Bckground of Kelsen’s Ideasrofessor of international law and legal philosophy Alfred VERDROSS (1890–1980) — the pure theory of law — is the “most refined and most successful” theory of law.. It should be mentioned that VERDROSS held a strong natural law position — quite contrary to KELSEN. According to another student of KELS
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:01:34 | 只看該作者
Early Systems of Formal Pragmaticsatics is, and still worse — I am afraid nobody does. In fact, the dispute on the aims, methods, scope and limits of pragmatics started as early as in the late thirties, and continues up to now. The discussion is far from being concluded, and that is just why you can still find there in the literatur
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 23:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
徐州市| 惠东县| 白玉县| 明光市| 县级市| 潜江市| 安康市| 马尔康县| 潍坊市| 广丰县| 晋城| 疏附县| 广灵县| 临潭县| 瓦房店市| 贵南县| 金坛市| 隆子县| 房产| 札达县| 南汇区| 济源市| 泽库县| 财经| 溧水县| 绍兴市| 大悟县| 微博| 太仆寺旗| 双牌县| 柳州市| 广汉市| 泾川县| 衡水市| 大名县| 法库县| 沛县| 崇礼县| 黎城县| 洛扎县| 越西县|