找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Logic Counts; Ewa ?arnecka-Bia?y Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Aristotle.Plato.logic.philosophy.truth

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: endocarditis
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:59:58 | 只看該作者
Ontologies and Ontologicscal analysis leads to rather troublesome questions: Are philosophical disciplines methodologically and/or essentially related and connected? Are particular philosophical disciplines scientific? And, if the answer is not definite, to what extent is this so? Do philosophical disciplines form a uniform
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:19:53 | 只看該作者
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 19:08:16 | 只看該作者
Two Levels of Modality: An Algebraic Approachlogics, namely those associated with algebraic models. It is an attempt to study modal logics within the framework of the theory of abstract logics. We begin by recalling some terms, constructions and notations, mainly taken from Brown & Suszko (1973).
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:40:26 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:20:57 | 只看該作者
When May G. E. Moore’s Definition of Internal Relation be Used Rationally?n controversy over the nature of relations. The author of that definition was right in his claim that the sense he established was metaphysically neutral for its serviceability in expressing each of the three positions to be separated in the dispute. Neohegelians saying that every relation is intern
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:07:54 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:07:15 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 16:43:58 | 只看該作者
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:58:02 | 只看該作者
Basic Norm and Metalanguage. Historical Bckground of Kelsen’s Ideasrofessor of international law and legal philosophy Alfred VERDROSS (1890–1980) — the pure theory of law — is the “most refined and most successful” theory of law.. It should be mentioned that VERDROSS held a strong natural law position — quite contrary to KELSEN. According to another student of KELS
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 03:01:34 | 只看該作者
Early Systems of Formal Pragmaticsatics is, and still worse — I am afraid nobody does. In fact, the dispute on the aims, methods, scope and limits of pragmatics started as early as in the late thirties, and continues up to now. The discussion is far from being concluded, and that is just why you can still find there in the literatur
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 02:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
通渭县| 平南县| 长子县| 温泉县| 普洱| 湘西| 台安县| 从江县| 班玛县| 台前县| 西乌珠穆沁旗| 乐业县| 台北县| 余庆县| 苏尼特左旗| 屏南县| 阿城市| 临高县| 车险| 和林格尔县| 本溪| 隆化县| 长泰县| 沛县| 南通市| 三门峡市| 山丹县| 临漳县| 潜山县| 邓州市| 枣阳市| 东宁县| 临安市| 普陀区| 即墨市| 兰考县| 琼海市| 隆安县| 昭平县| 长沙市| 南宁市|