Titlebook: Local Government Explained; Ivor H. Seeley Textbook 1978Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1978 Government.local government.polit

惹人反感

Local Government Needs and the Future,lose interest in community matters and can, ultimately, result in the individual abrogating his responsibilities to society. Richards. has described how local government is nevertheless the smallest and most approachable unit in our system of public administration and should accordingly be able to p

昏睡中

Ivor H. Seeley B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.S., C.Eng., F.I.Mun.E., F.I.Q.S., M.I.O.B.r their actions are permissible, forbidden, or required. And finally, Aristotle has been lately been categorized as a ‘virtue theorist’ who holds that an action’s value consists in its being the expression of a virtue; while Kant is supposedly a deontologist who thinks that the value of an action re

corn732

Ivor H. Seeley B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.S., C.Eng., F.I.Mun.E., F.I.Q.S., M.I.O.B.een argued that Kantianism should itself be understood as the product of precisely the emotion-driven processes it fails to acknowledge. The charge, then, is that Kantian moral theory as such is best understood as the result of emotional gut reactions. This claim has been formulated most prominently

驚呼

PLE

UTTER

Ivor H. Seeley B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.S., C.Eng., F.I.Mun.E., F.I.Q.S., M.I.O.B.omenology of such reasoning, as does the claim that all our actions proceed from explicitlyadopted general policies, or maxims. It then goes on to discuss the second problem showing how it is a result of Kant’s apparent claim that when an agent acts from duty, her reason for doing so is that her max

和音

Ivor H. Seeley B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.S., C.Eng., F.I.Mun.E., F.I.Q.S., M.I.O.B.e maxim, rather than a proper constituent). Therefore, and crucially, the lawlike nature of her maxim is not the good-willed agent’s reason for Φ-ing when she Φs from duty; rather, it is the reason why something else—the existence of a certain sort of obtaining situation, and thus a ‘concrete consid

alliance

Ivor H. Seeley B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.S., C.Eng., F.I.Mun.E., F.I.Q.S., M.I.O.B.in tension with each other but rather complementary parts of his complete picture: far from having an unsituated account of agency, Kant’s picture of the way our agency is systematically and structurally flawed follows from putting together our actual circumstances (situatedness) with his abstract a

accessory

Ivor H. Seeley B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.I.C.S., C.Eng., F.I.Mun.E., F.I.Q.S., M.I.O.B.in tension with each other but rather complementary parts of his complete picture: far from having an unsituated account of agency, Kant’s picture of the way our agency is systematically and structurally flawed follows from putting together our actual circumstances (situatedness) with his abstract a

增強

issue raised here about the character of these distinctions, which then leads to the question of the nature of the morally good and the force it has/should have in the deliberations/intentions/actions of agents. The focus of Deligiorgi’s paper is on these meta-ethical and meta-normative issues raise