Titlebook: Local Government Budget Stabilization; Explorations and Evi Yilin Hou Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

不如樂死去

痛苦一下

Palpate

Book 2015budget stabilization at the local level. It examines budget stabilization in the United States from the 1910s to 2010 (from adoption of public budgeting in this country through the Great Recession). In addition, it provides details on the methods and results of empirical tests of the effects of budg

FORGO

Local Government Budget Stabilization: An Introduction,ial for use in other studies. The third section summarizes each of the following chapters as a quick overview of their components and major findings. The last section casts some prospective thoughts of the editor on what remains to be done and explored in these areas of research based on what has been provided in this volume.

grounded

Impact of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Local Government Savings,unrestricted cash reserves. This has wide-ranging implications on fiscal performance including the government’s ability to cope with negative revenue and expenditure shocks and their ability to retain resources for strategic purposes.

施魔法

Inherent System Dynamics of Instability and Resilience in Nonprofit Human Services,tutional environment raises the caution that increasing reserve funds in these organizations cannot simply be done by encouraging better financial management practices. Consideration has to be given to reducing the barriers created by the set of complex perspectives and norms that affect the legitimacy of surplus accumulation.

和藹

黃瓜

The Great Recession and the Use of Fund Balances in North Carolina Counties,le in North Carolina counties during the Great Recession, but not during previous recessions. Over the years, these local governments may have improved their fiscal capacity in using fund balances for dealing with economic downturns.

欲望

root of human dignity. Nonetheless, it is arguable whether Kant’s juridical philosophy may accept all the precepts usually associated with the notion of human rights. This paper claims that, in accordance with Kant’s juridical philosophy, social rights should not be considered as a species of human

緯線