找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Litigating the Rights of the Child; The UN Convention on Ton Liefaard,Jaap E. Doek Book 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 桌前不可入
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:16:50 | 只看該作者
,The?CRC in Litigation Under the ICCPR and CEDAW,rights of the child were hitherto justiciable before the Human Rights Committee and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, both of which have produced useful jurisprudence. While these Committees will continue to have jurisdiction over such cases, it is to be expected that
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:39:32 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:04:54 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:01:06 | 只看該作者
The CRC as a Litigation Tool Before the Inter-American System of Protection of Human Rights,ction of Human Rights. First, it argues that the CRC is used as a tool of litigation at the substantial level when construing the obligations of States Parties by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in individual complaints under the American Convention on Human Rights. Secondly, the chapter ex
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:41:39 | 只看該作者
,Children’s Rights Litigation in the African Region: Lessons from the Communications Procedure Under Child (1990). The communications procedure under the African Children’s Charter is explained with reference to the Charter itself as well as the rules of procedure developed in 2006 by the African Committee of Experts on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. The finding of the Committee in the first
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:53:20 | 只看該作者
India,cutive decisions. This chapter attempts to highlight how the ratification of the CRC is reflected in the drafting of legislation in the country and examples of some of the cases in which the courts at different levels in India—High Courts in the States and Supreme Court—have alluded to or cited the CRC in its pronouncements.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:05:50 | 只看該作者
,The?CRC in Litigation Under the ICCPR and CEDAW,both of which have produced useful jurisprudence. While these Committees will continue to have jurisdiction over such cases, it is to be expected that henceforth petitioners will turn to the Committee on the Rights of the Child as the most specialised body in the field.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 04:39:02 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:13:37 | 只看該作者
The Netherlands,interests in decision-making. Children’s rights are taken more seriously in the Dutch courtroom. Future challenges include deploying the CRC in substantive, meaningful ways instead of as a piece of abstract magic, and preventing it from being used to over-protect children.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:38:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 16:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
万州区| 沧州市| 宁国市| 新源县| 福州市| 无棣县| 张家港市| 灵武市| 康保县| 上杭县| 三明市| 万山特区| 双鸭山市| 五大连池市| 个旧市| 察雅县| 富宁县| 寻乌县| 久治县| 宝兴县| 濮阳市| 绥芬河市| 朝阳区| 太白县| 遂昌县| 花莲县| 桂阳县| 阿克陶县| 扶绥县| 喀喇沁旗| 修水县| 江门市| 板桥市| 盐边县| 故城县| 上高县| 岳阳市| 城固县| 岑巩县| 汉源县| 黔江区|