Titlebook: Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature; New Interdisciplinar Andrea Selleri,Philip Gaydon Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable

Espionage

書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature被引頻次




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature年度引用




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature讀者反饋




書目名稱Literary Studies and the Philosophy of Literature讀者反饋學科排名

鞭打

Analytic Philosophy of Literature: Problems and Prospectse. After discussing its history and characteristics, it examines certain alleged weaknesses of the analytic approach, such as its neglect of the empirical and historical. Finally, it considers the prospects of the analytic enterprise and suggests how it can best contribute to our understanding of literature.

Comedienne

Commentary

Poetic Utterances: Attuning Poetry and Philosophym, leaving us in doubt whether its various features are indeed exemplified. This chapter aims to give us the resources to practise attunement on whole poems, thus shedding light on the way that phrases of this type fit into broader patterns.

GAVEL

Literary Examples in Analytic Aesthetics: The Claim of the Empiricalbeen vitiated by an insufficient concern with the particularities of the literary works used as examples. There follows an outline of some ways in which a fuller acquaintance with literary studies may help aestheticians strike a better balance between clear-headedness about the general and fidelity to the empirical.

神刊

What Do We Do with Words? Framing What Is at Stake in Dealing with Literaturenot as ‘literature’, and that, if there is something to be acknowledged as peculiar of literature, it is its capacity (1) to stage everything that philosophers and theorists have to explain; and (2) to escape any act of definition and of categorisation.

Minikin

Anal-Canal

消耗

模仿

Criticism, Philosophy and the Differend that distinguishes them from one another on a range of issues. Jean-Fran?ois Lyotard defines ‘the differend’ as a divide that cannot be bridged, or a difference that cannot be resolved for lack of a rule that ultimately binds both parties. Do criticism and philosophy face a differend, or can they combine to answer shared questions?