Titlebook: Literary Materialisms; Mathias Nilges (associate professor of English and Book 2013 Mathias Nilges and Emilio Sauri 2013 America.Close rea

Strategy

書目名稱Literary Materialisms影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Literary Materialisms影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literary Materialisms網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Literary Materialisms網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literary Materialisms被引頻次




書目名稱Literary Materialisms被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literary Materialisms年度引用




書目名稱Literary Materialisms年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literary Materialisms讀者反饋




書目名稱Literary Materialisms讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Credence

Reading Dialectically2009 might seem destined for the remainder shelves. Especially one that concludes with a long, final section closely reading a work of narrative theory with which few scholars today would be familiar, in order to argue that the task of criticism is to “make time and history appear”—at a moment when,

弄污

Marxist Criticism, Then and NowMarxist criticism might take in the twenty-first? These are huge questions—too large for a short essay; to answer them properly would require, to begin with, some assessment of the state of various Marxisms today (whatever existence they eke out here and there) as well as the situation in which the

商議

Literature, Immanent Critique, and the Problem of Standpointof “Principles of Immanent Critique.” My most immediately practical aim in writing such a work is to make available to the public, and especially to students, the outline of a proposed method for critical theory in the humanities and “cultural studies” generally, and more particularly in relation to

Exhilarate

infatuation

Indurate

How to Subsume Difference, or World Reduction in Delanyut the conditions and capacities of systemic forms of social knowledge. The paucity of scholarship on this text is all the more striking given its routine identification, in the words of one Delany scholar, as “the first novel-length work of fiction on AIDS from a major publishcr in the United State

鋼筆記下懲罰

Defining the Worldt might, for instance, view its task as broadly sociological but bristle at any suggestion this should marginalize the aesthetic. It might characterize itself primarily in terms of institutional critique, especially where its substance is cast in the umbra of ideological apparatuses and against whic

新字

幻想

Objective Form: Reflections on the Dialectic of Rogueryicult to act upon. It was very widespread in Brazil before the military coup of 1964, yet the critical yield was almost negligible. If we discount the vocabulary, which, in the enthusiasm of the period, became more and more social, the interpretation of Brazilian literature, whether as a whole or si