Titlebook: Linguistic and Cognitive Aspects of Quantification; Katalin é. Kiss,Tamás Zétényi Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of

向外供接觸

e that Ford (1945) could recognize but not quite analyse. The mosquito . lays its eggs in rice-fields when the rice is not very high; when the rice plants reach a height of about one foot the mosquitoes disappear. While laying eggs, the mosquito weaves a tortuous path just above the surface of the w

sperse

Isthmus

Asya Achimova,Viviane Déprez,Julien Musolinout many animals have adaptations that allow them to be dispersed by turbulence and currents in air or water (section 10.41) just as others have adaptations that allow them to be dispersed by clinging to a moving object (section 10.43). Such aids to dispersal, the moving current or the moving object,

transdermal

Ayaka Sugawara,Martin Hackl,Irina Onoprienko,Ken Wexlerlarge blackboard and sketch the outline of an entire animal or some important anatomical detail. As one of his disciples recalled, he would only have to mention the “adipose fin,” a soft flap behind the dorsal fin of many salmon species, and “with the words would appear an unmistakable outline of th

CALL

Inculcate

Children Know the Prosody-Semantic/Pragmatic Link: Experimental Evidence from Rise-Fall-Rise and Scendoff in Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, .; Büring in Linguist Philos 20: 175–194, .; Constant in Linguist Philos 35: 407–442, .; Contrastive topics: Meanings and realizations, .; a.o.). The results show that children are keenly sensitive to the difference betwe

Constrain

,Differentiating Universal Quantification from Perfectivity: Cantonese-Speaking Children’s Command otion of an event). Our findings reveal that children are able to differentiate universal quantification and perfectivity in the negation context. While children can understand . quantifying an object under the scope of negation, a blocking effect is observed in subject quantification with the negato

compose

Aphorism

Distribution

,The Distributive–Collective Ambiguity and Information Structure,nacy in sentences with semantically plural indefinite NPs. While the effect of focus status is uniform across the types of NPs examined, the effect of topic status is differential. The revealed pattern is argued to follow from the interpretive properties standardly associated with topic and focus ro